The recent depegging of USDC from $1 has raised concerns within the cryptocurrency industry about the stability of the stablecoin ecosystem. The collapse of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB), where Circle held $3.3 billion or 8.2% of its USDC reserves, caused uncertainty and resulted in USDC's initial depegging on Friday.
The recent depegging of USDC from $1 has raised concerns within the cryptocurrency industry about the stability of the stablecoin ecosystem. The collapse of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB), where Circle held $3.3 billion or 8.2% of its USDC reserves, caused uncertainty and resulted in USDC's initial depegging on Friday. The stablecoin fell to as low as 88 cents on Saturday before recovering to $1 after the funds became available on Monday morning. However, this incident highlighted a crucial flaw in the design of existing fiat-backed stablecoins, according to Nevin Freeman, co-founder and CEO of Reserve.
Freeman noted that stablecoin issuers have no choice but to rely on fractional reserve banks when providing liquidity to their users. If any of the banks fail without a bailout and the issuer can't fill the hole with their own capital or a new capital injection, it would either force a bank run on the stablecoin, leaving the last to redeem with nothing, or the issuer would have to close down and go into bankruptcy to prevent such a run. USDC's price acted as a live prediction market for whether SVB depositors would be made whole, Freeman said. The stablecoin rallied from 97 cents to 99 cents after the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the U.S. Federal Reserve announced that depositors would be made whole. It only recovered to $1 after the banks opened and actually operated.
The collapse of SVB has raised questions about the stability of the stablecoin ecosystem and the need for a new design that can avoid such risks. Stablecoin issuers may need to look for alternative solutions that don't rely on fractional reserve banks to provide liquidity to their users. The recent incident has shown that the stablecoin design needs to be improved to prevent similar problems in the future. Stablecoin issuers need to be proactive in addressing the issue and finding a solution that ensures the stability of their coins.
According to Pietro Saggese, a postdoctoral scientist at the Austrian Institute of Technology, the collapse of USDC would have had significant consequences on the entire cryptocurrency ecosystem. He states that it could have led to cascades of liquidations in decentralized finance (DeFi) lending protocols, causing severe disruptions. However, the fact that USDC is currently trading at par with the U.S. dollar is a positive sign that the market has recovered after this shock.
Lucas Kiely, the chief investment officer of the digital wealth platform Yield App, noted that stablecoin depegging is a common occurrence in volatile markets, and the situation was not unexpected. He stated that the depegging of USDC was a short-term factor driven by fear around a failed bank where Circle held a deposit. He further explained that this was a short-term driver, and the de-pegging is unlikely to have a long-term impact on the stablecoin industry.
It is important to note that USDC was not the only stablecoin that depegged over the weekend. DAI, a crypto-collateralized and decentralized stablecoin, also fell and recovered amid SVB's collapse. Stablecoin depegging in volatile markets is not uncommon, and it is a risk that investors need to be aware of when investing in these assets.
Despite the short-term disruption caused by the depegging of stablecoins, the overall outlook for the stablecoin industry remains positive. Stablecoins have become an essential component of the cryptocurrency ecosystem, providing stability and liquidity to the market. As the cryptocurrency industry continues to mature, stablecoins are likely to play an increasingly critical role in facilitating transactions and reducing volatility in the market.
In 2022, the stablecoin industry faced two major incidents, revealing the consequences of inadequate regulation and accountability. The collapse of algorithmic stablecoin Terra had a ripple effect throughout the crypto economy, and the bankruptcy of FTX resulted in their downfall. These incidents have exposed the risks associated with stablecoins and the importance of proper oversight.
While some stablecoins are backed by cash reserves, others are backed by crypto assets, which many people in the industry consider riskier. USDC, for example, is backed by a mix of cash and short-term U.S. Treasury bonds. However, stablecoins, like any other investment, carry risk and are subject to volatility. Investors must bear this in mind when considering investing in them.
Some in the crypto industry have expressed dissatisfaction with stablecoins in their current form. Terrence Yang, managing director at Swan Bitcoin, has gone so far as to call USDC a “fraud on its face,” arguing that it is not stable and is not backed by U.S. dollars. He believes they should be renamed “U.S. dollar-denominated crypto IOUs.”
It is crucial to note that the depegging of stablecoins could have further consequences. While it is too early to draw conclusions, the collapse of SVB may have intensified investors' fears during a period of widespread lack of confidence in the crypto sector. Speculators may have played a significant role, but this cannot be confirmed yet.
Stablecoins and centralized exchanges exist between traditional finance and the crypto financial system, with pledges of stability and full collateralization that are not always guaranteed, according to industry experts. The recent events surrounding stablecoin USDC have demonstrated the real concern of systemic risk stemming from links between traditional and crypto finance. As a result, governments and financial regulators may intervene to protect customers from potential financial losses.
This event may also lead to stricter regulations on stablecoins and other actors in the crypto ecosystem, such as centralized crypto exchanges. However, this could be a good thing for the industry, as clearer guidelines are needed for more institutions to enter. The destabilization of USDC has shaken trust throughout the industry, but the crypto world understands that this was an issue with fractional-reserve banking rather than with Circle or Coinbase or the technology itself.
Industry experts hope that stablecoin issuers can eventually take commercial banks out of the loop, leading to a reduction in risk and greater clarity for this burgeoning asset class. The latest market event is expected to trigger more interest in the stablecoin sector among global regulators, leading to greater regulatory oversight and potentially a more stable and secure financial system.
As a reminder, WikiBit is ready to help you search the qualifications and reputation of projects in a bid to protect you from hidden dangers in this risky industry!
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.