Starknet opens vote on potential Ethereum L2 exit over quantum risks

Abstract:Starknet opens a seven-day governance vote on exploring an independent post-quantum L1, citing security dependencies tied to Ethereums upgrade timeline.

Ethereum layer-2 network Starknet has opened a non-binding vote asking STRK holders whether it should explore becoming an independent, post-quantum layer-1 blockchain.

On Thursday, Starknet opened a seven-day poll, which offers three options: support further research, oppose it, or remain neutral pending more information. Voting closes on Oct. 22, with results published afterwards.

A “Yes” vote would signal support for further research, not authorize a transition. Further proposals and governance votes would be required, and no timetable for becoming an L1 has been announced.

StarkWare, the developer behind Starknet, said the move could allow the network to pursue quantum-resistant security without depending on Ethereums upgrade schedule. Starknet currently relies on Ethereum for infrastructure, including its bridge and data availability, which StarkWare identifies as remaining quantum-security dependencies.

“Quantum-proofing crypto is urgent, so we must move at lightning speed,” StarkWare CEO Eli Ben-Sasson told Cointelegraph, contrasting the proposal with what he described as slower progress at Ethereum and Bitcoin.

Both Ben-Sasson and Starknet hinted at the proposal in separate X posts on Oct. 8, framing it as a move to become “the first fully quantum-resistant network” by 2027.

In June, StarkWare unveiled a three-phase quantum-resistance roadmap for Starknet, covering signature upgrades, smart-contract migration and Ethereum-dependent infrastructure.

In March, Ethereum developers established a dedicated post-quantum team, aiming to introduce initial protocol-level protections by 2029.

Disclaimer

The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Previous Post

Ledger wants customers to trust its new $849 device as criminals compromise existing wallets

Next

MSCI adopts index exclusion rules that could oust Strategy