Starknet opens vote on potential Ethereum L2 exit over quantum risks

Resumo:Starknet opens a seven-day governance vote on exploring an independent post-quantum L1, citing security dependencies tied to Ethereums upgrade timeline.

Ethereum layer-2 network Starknet has opened a non-binding vote asking STRK holders whether it should explore becoming an independent, post-quantum layer-1 blockchain.

On Thursday, Starknet opened a seven-day poll, which offers three options: support further research, oppose it, or remain neutral pending more information. Voting closes on Oct. 22, with results published afterwards.

A “Yes” vote would signal support for further research, not authorize a transition. Further proposals and governance votes would be required, and no timetable for becoming an L1 has been announced.

StarkWare, the developer behind Starknet, said the move could allow the network to pursue quantum-resistant security without depending on Ethereums upgrade schedule. Starknet currently relies on Ethereum for infrastructure, including its bridge and data availability, which StarkWare identifies as remaining quantum-security dependencies.

“Quantum-proofing crypto is urgent, so we must move at lightning speed,” StarkWare CEO Eli Ben-Sasson told Cointelegraph, contrasting the proposal with what he described as slower progress at Ethereum and Bitcoin.

Both Ben-Sasson and Starknet hinted at the proposal in separate X posts on Oct. 8, framing it as a move to become “the first fully quantum-resistant network” by 2027.

In June, StarkWare unveiled a three-phase quantum-resistance roadmap for Starknet, covering signature upgrades, smart-contract migration and Ethereum-dependent infrastructure.

In March, Ethereum developers established a dedicated post-quantum team, aiming to introduce initial protocol-level protections by 2029.

Isenção de responsabilidade

Os pontos de vista expressos neste artigo representam a opinião pessoal do autor e não constituem conselhos de investimento da plataforma. A plataforma não garante a veracidade, completude ou actualidade da informação contida neste artigo e não é responsável por quaisquer perdas resultantes da utilização ou confiança na informação contida neste artigo.
Postagem anterior

Golpista perde US$ 4,8 milhões armazenados em Ledgers adulterados: Asia Express

Próximo

MSCI adota regras de exclusão de índices que podem retirar a Strategy