Exchanges with 24H trading volume exceeding 80.76%

Basic Information
RiskNotice

No Regulatory License
Be aware of the risks!
User Feedback
The trading fees of Azbit are really too high, and the customer service response speed is so slow that it is unbearable.
While Azbit's user interface is newbie-friendly, I must say, their liquidity leaves quite a room for improvement.
The interface of Azbit is confusing and uncluttered, it's not user-friendly at all. Customer support is also unresponsive.
I am impressed with Azbit's user interface, which is easy to use and quite convenient. However, their customer support service needs to improve.
| Currency/Name | Trade | Unit Price | Change | 24H Vol | +2%/-2% Market Depth | Liquidity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTC/USDT | $79,021.34 | 2.13% | $1,382,885,378.28 | $19.99M/$20.78M | 1,013 | |
| ETH/USDT | $2,480.21 | 1.32% | $184,384,648.87 | $11.55M/$11.98M | 834 | |
| XRP/USDT | $1.48 | 1.82% | $48,227,252.29 | $928.28K/$762.83K | 638 | |
| LINK/USDT | $11.57 | 0.29% | $29,055,332.47 | $224.80K/$171.88K | 546 | |
| DOGE/USDT | $0.08932219 | 4.16% | $21,418,649.87 | $982.54K/$722.08K | 578 | |
| BNB/USDT | $704.68 | 0.81% | $20,612,146.42 | $4.01M/$4.06M | 637 | |
| USDC/USDT | $0.99995255 | 0.00% | $14,769,545.45 | $17.93M/$16.85M | 709 | |
| SOL/USDT | $96.16 | 1.01% | $12,020,009.68 | $909.32K/$975.45K | 597 | |
| LTC/USDT | $52.03 | 0.67% | $10,087,848.58 | $592.24K/$375.17K | 530 | |
| ADA/USDT | $0.22018075 | 2.27% | $9,811,470.72 | $510.84K/$281.22K | 467 |
Exchange Overview
Exchange Overview
Lauched on 28 December 2019 and advised by Bitcoin.com founder Roger Ver, Azbit is a cryptocurrency exchange that offers spot crypto trading and crypt wallets. Azbit also provides Staking, Savings and Initial Exchange Offerings (IEO).
The exchange is in business for more than 3 years. During that time, over 400 cryptocurrency projects were successfully listed on the platform.
Azbit's plan is to build a bridge between the world of traditional finance and the world of cryptocurrencies.
Business Region
InfluenceBNews
WikiBit Exchange Exit Risk Ranking #18: Poloniex — How Did the 12-Year “Living Fossil” of the Crypto Industry Become a “Top Wanted Target” in the Eyes of Regulators?
Preface: The Two Sides of a “Legacy Brand” In the previous 17 editions, we investigated a series of exchanges ranging from HashKey to BigONE. Today, in the 18th edition, we turn our attention to a true “ancient beast” of the crypto world — Poloniex. Its résumé could be described as a “living fossil among crypto exchanges”: “Founded in 2014,” “12 years of operating history,” “one of the earliest exchanges to introduce Proof of Reserves (PoR),” “maintaining a reserve ratio above 100% for 20 consecutive months,” “a $100 million user protection fund,” “daily trading volume exceeding $1.1 billion in April 2026, surpassing Bitget and MEXC,” “supporting more than 350 cryptocurrencies” — doesnt that sound like the perfect image of a “long-established and reliable major exchange”? But on the other side of the story: The Seychelles Financial Services Authority (FSA) issued a public warning in March 2026, stating that the company operating Poloniex had already been dissolved on January 1, 2022, and was no longer a legitimate legal entity. The U.S. SEC previously fined Poloniex $10 million, accusing it of knowingly operating an unregistered securities trading platform. Indias Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU-IND) ordered Poloniex to be blocked for violating anti-money laundering regulations. Trustpilot gave Poloniex a score of only 2.0/5,

WikiBit Exchange Exit Scam Risk List — No. 17: BigONE — Li Xiaolai and “Old Cat’s” “Living Fossil” of the Crypto World: How Did It Become a “Regulatory Blacklist Regular”?
Introduction: The A and B Sides of a “Living Fossil” in Crypto Over the first 16 editions, we dug into a series of exchanges ranging from HashKey to Hibt. Today, in the 17th edition, we turn to a genuine crypto “old-timer” — BigONE. Its résumé reads like a “living fossil” of the crypto industry: “Founded in 2017,” “the original Yunbi team,” “co-founded by Li Xiaolai and Old Cat (Yu Wenzhuo),” “incubated by INBlockchain (InBlockchain Capital),” “ranked No. 40 globally on CoinMarketCap,” “nine years of operating history,” and “approximately $426 million in Proof of Reserves (PoR).” Sounds like a veteran, legitimate crypto institution, right? But on the other side of the story — Japans Financial Services Agency (FSA) has repeatedly warned and cracked down on it for “continuing to operate without obtaining a license despite receiving multiple warnings.” On September 2, 2026, the Korea Digital Asset Exchange Alliance (DAXA) found that BigONE was allegedly operating in South Korea without registration and called for a police investigation. CoinPaprika labels it “not MiCA compliant,” with a confidence score of only 5.76%. WikiBit describes it as operating under “loose regulation.” CoinGecko gives it a Trust Score of 5/10, while Trustpilot rates it just 2/5. In July 2025, BigONE suffered a supply-chain

WikiBit Exchange Exit Scam Risk Report #16 — Hibt: MSB “Sticker Compliance” + 3 Million Users, How Did a “Data Giant” Become a Withdrawal Black Hole?
Introduction: A “Split-Personality” Exchange With Impressive Data and Extremely Difficult Withdrawals In the previous 15 editions, we investigated a series of exchanges ranging from HashKey to OrangeX. For the 16th edition, we are looking at one of the most “split-personality” platforms in the crypto industry — Hibt. Its resume sounds almost like a crypto “humblebrag” masterpiece:“Registered in Canada in 2021”“Headquartered in Dubai, with operations across Japan, South Korea, and other regions”“Holding Canadian and U.S. MSB registrations”“470+ cryptocurrencies and 500+ trading pairs”“Ranked among the global top 50 exchanges on CoinMarketCap, with over $1 billion in 24-hour spot trading volume”“90% of assets stored in cold wallets”“200+ professional employees”“Serving more than 3 million users worldwide” At first glance, this sounds like a platform with the configuration of a top-10 global exchange. But on the other side:WikiBit rating: 6.06/10, labeled “No Effective Regulation”Trustpilot rating: 2.2/5, with users openly calling it a “SCAM”Some users report that withdrawal applications have remained under review for more than two months, with funds never returned So how did a “data giant” claiming billions in trading volume become a “withdrawal black hole” in users eyes? Today, we break it down layer by layer.1. Regulatory Compliance: An MSB Is a “Sticker,” Not a Real License Hibts “Compliance Package”

