Ethereum Foundation Faces Transparency Push as RWA Market Hits $65B With ETH at 33% Share
The criticism extends beyond the departures themselves to the broader question of leadership accountability. Community members point out that the foundation has historically operated with a deliberately loose, decentralized structure intended to preserve the networks neutrality and prevent power concentration. Yet that same design now sits uneasily against an ecosystem that underpins hundreds of billions of dollars in tokenized assets, lending markets and decentralized finance activity. Several voices on X argued that responsibilities inside the organization appear to be shifting without clear public communication. Requests for clarification on the changes had not produced detailed responses at the time of writing, deepening frustration among independent developers and ecosystem allocators alike. In March, the foundation issued a public mandate intended to clarify its priorities, emphasizing long-term resilience, credible neutrality and continued support for core infrastructure development on Ethereum. That statement was widely read as an attempt to address growing demands for clearer accountability following earlier governance disputes. The current shakeup, however, suggests that document has not fully resolved underlying tensions. Some longtime contributors view the structural opacity as a necessary feature that protects the protocol from capture, while others see it as increasingly incompatible with the scale of capital now flowing through the