کرپٹو انڈسٹری کی خبریں اور مارکیٹ رجحانات

California Crypto Laws 2026: Public-Official Meme Coin Ban and New Digital-Asset Seizure Framework

California has signed two crypto-focused statutes that target different risks:AB 2409: conflicts of interest and public-official meme coins;SB 1208: digital-asset money laundering, seizure, forfeiture and victim restitution.　　The package is broader than a single “meme coin ban” headline, but it is also narrower than a general prohibition on meme coins or cryptocurrency trading.AB 2409: who cannot issue a meme coin？　　AB 2409 prohibits a covered:　　public officer or public employee　　from issuing a meme coin.　　The laws public-officer category includes state/local elected or appointed officials and members of governmental boards, commissions or similar bodies.　　The covered public-employee category is narrower and includes employees with decision-making authority over government bids and contracts.What counts as “issue”？　　The bill defines issuance broadly around making the token available for:public purchase;donation;exchange of value;　　whether or not the official personally promotes it.　　That matters because the rule cannot necessarily be avoided simply by saying an official “did not advertise” a token.Platform listing rule　　AB 2409 also restricts digital-asset service providers serving California residents.　　A provider may not list for sale or purchase by a California resident a meme coin:issued on or after January 1, 2027;offered by, or in partnership with, a federal public official or a state/local public officer.　　This rule reaches official-linked tokens at the point of

2 دن پہلےانڈسٹری ریسرچ

Tether and Iran: Senate PSI Says 84% of 846 Studied Wallets Relied Almost Entirely on USDT

Tether faces a new level of U.S. sanctions and anti-money-laundering scrutiny after Democratic staff of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations published a September 28 report on USDT use in Iran-linked financial networks.　　The headline finding is:　　84% of 846 studied wallets transacted exclusively or nearly exclusively in USDT.　　The same day, Tether published a detailed response centered on its law-enforcement record and said it had supported approximately:　　$550 million　　of Iran-linked USDT freezes during 2026.　　These statements are not mutually exclusive. The policy dispute is about whether issuer-level controls were applied quickly and proactively enough, not whether Tether has a technical ability to freeze USDT.Who issued the report？　　The report was released by Senator Richard Blumenthal, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations.　　It reflects the work of PSI Democratic investigators/staff.　　That distinction matters politically and legally. It is a congressional investigative report, not:a Treasury sanctions designation;a DOJ indictment;an SEC/CFTC order;a court judgment.What wallets were studied？　　PSI says investigators analyzed blockchain transaction data from:　　846 unique cryptocurrency wallets　　that had been:sanctioned; ortargeted for seizure;　　because of associations with Iran and regional proxies.　　The designations/seizure targets came from U.S. and Israeli authorities over several years.The 84% finding　　The Senate release says:　　84% of the 846 wallets transacted exclusively or nearly exclusively in USDT.　　The

2 دن پہلےانڈسٹری ریسرچ

Bitquery pegs Robinhood Chain rug-pull crew at 56 launches, $15.5M take

A blockchain investigation has extended the suspected rug-pull operations on Robinhood Chain to 56 memecoin launches. It also puts the groups estimated take at a lower $15.5 million.　　Bitquery published its results on September 28. The report examines the period of the activity until September 23, which is two days after the date used for the first estimate of $18.43 million.　　The larger problem extends farther than determining which of the estimates is more accurate. Bitquerys analysis of the market indicates how the features employed in launching new memecoins offer coordinated traders an advantage compared to ordinary investors. The majority of the traced market activity was happening on Pons, a token launchpad that runs on Robinhood Chain.　　How a funded wallet buys the whole curve　　Pons uses a bonding curve to sell its new tokens, enabling the earliest buyers to have the lowest prices. In a bid to avoid sniping, the platform charges 99% tax at the time of initial purchases. This tax then reduces to zero within five seconds. The creator of the tokens can choose which wallets are exempt from tax, according to The Block.　　Bitquery connected one incident to the launch of DEED on September 21. Around 40 minutes prior to the

2 دن پہلےانڈسٹری

Bitget Hack Update: BTC Withdrawals Are Open; ETH Restoration Is Next After $388M Breach

Bitget has completed the first planned withdrawal-recovery milestone after the September 24 breach.　　The exchange confirms that:　　BTC withdrawals resumed at 08:00 UTC on September 28　　and are open on:the Bitcoin network;BNB Smart Chain.　　This materially improves the user-access picture compared with the full withdrawal freeze in place immediately after the incident.What is open now　　BTC withdrawal support is confirmed operational on two networks.　　Bitgets remaining schedule is:Sep. 29 08:00 UTC: ETH on Ethereum, BSC, Arbitrum, Base and Optimism;Sep. 30 08:00 UTC: USDT on Ethereum, BSC, Solana and Tron;Oct. 2 08:00 UTC: other supported tokens, fiat withdrawals and P2P.　　At this reports cutoff, the ETH milestone remains in the future.The incident amount is now described as approximately $388M　　Bitgets updated incident page uses approximately:　　$388 million　　as its current estimate.　　The exchange says the incident involved 12 wallet addresses associated with hot or warm wallet infrastructure and activity across 11 blockchains.　　Affected assets identified to date include:XRP;ETH;USDT;ZEC;ATOM;USDC;USD0;XAUt;BNB;AVAX;TRX;ALGO;TIA.　　The estimate can still be adjusted as transaction classification and on-chain tracing continue.The current attack explanation is more specific　　Bitget now says the attacker may have exploited a vulnerability in a:　　third-party security product　　to potentially obtain high-level internal credentials.　　The attacker then appears to have:impersonated authorized activity;sent fraudulent withdrawal commands to the wallet system;bypassed existing risk controls;triggered abnormal transfers

2 دن پہلےانڈسٹری ریسرچ

Franklin Templeton × Bybit: Tokenized Money-Market Funds Become Off-Exchange Trading Collateral

Tokenized money-market funds are moving from investment products into trading infrastructure.　　Franklin Templeton expanded its off-exchange collateral program to Bybit on September 28, allowing eligible institutional users to pledge tokenized money-market fund shares and receive USDT or USDC trading credit.　　The shares are issued through Franklin Templetons Benji Technology Platform.　　The underlying assets remain in regulated off-exchange custody through ByCustody rather than being transferred into Bybits exchange wallets.　　Their value is mirrored into the trading environment.　　The investor can therefore continue earning money-market yield while using the asset to support crypto trading.　　That architecture addresses one of institutional cryptos most persistent problems:　　how do you use capital efficiently without putting all of it inside an exchange？The Collateral Stays Off the Exchange　　Traditional exchange trading often requires users to deposit collateral directly onto the venue.　　That creates counterparty exposure.　　If the exchange fails, freezes withdrawals or suffers a security incident, the collateral can become trapped.　　Off-exchange collateral changes that model.　　The asset remains with a custody arrangement outside the trading venue, while the exchange recognizes its value and extends a credit line.　　This separates two functions:　　asset custody and trading liquidity.　　That is especially attractive to institutions after repeated crypto exchange failures and hacks.Yield-Bearing Collateral Improves Capital Efficiency　　Cash collateral often sits idle.　　A tokenized money-market fund can

2 دن پہلےانڈسٹری ریسرچ

Tether, Iran and USDT: Stablecoins as Both Sanctions Rails and Enforcement Chokepoints

USDT is at the center of a new U.S. sanctions debate because it combines two characteristics that appear contradictory.　　It is globally liquid and easy to move across crypto networks.　　It is also issued by a company that can freeze specific token balances.　　On September 28, Democratic staff of the U.S. Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations released a report arguing that Tethers USDT has become deeply embedded in Iran-linked shadow-banking networks.　　The report says investigators analyzed 846 cryptocurrency wallets that had been sanctioned, targeted for seizure or otherwise associated with Iran and its regional proxies. According to the report, 84% of those wallets had transacted exclusively or nearly exclusively in USDT.　　Senator Richard Blumenthal called for Treasury and the Department of Justice to investigate Tethers sanctions and anti-money-laundering practices.　　Tether pushed back the same day by emphasizing its cooperation with law enforcement. The company said actions involving USDT had frozen approximately $550 million across wallets U.S. authorities identified as connected to Irans central bank and sanctions networks during 2026.　　These claims should not be collapsed into a simple conclusion that “Tether supports Iran” or “Tether stopped all illicit use.”　　The more useful question is structural:　　Why is the same stablecoin attractive to sanctioned actors and useful to enforcement agencies？Dollar

2 دن پہلےانڈسٹری ریسرچ

Goldman Sachs FTIXX on Lynq: Why Blockchain Distribution Does Not Require Tokenization

Goldman Sachs has found a different way to connect traditional asset management with crypto infrastructure.　　Its roughly $100 billion Treasury money-market fund, FTIXX, is being made available to institutional digital-asset firms through Lynq, a settlement network built on a private, permissioned Avalanche Layer 1.　　The important part is what Goldman did not do.　　FTIXX is not being converted into a blockchain token.　　It remains a conventional fund. Lynq becomes a new distribution and workflow layer around it, while trades are handled by SEC-registered broker-dealer tZERO Securities.　　That makes the structure a useful counterexample to one of cryptos most common assumptions:　　bringing an asset into blockchain-based financial infrastructure does not always require tokenizing the asset itself.Tokenization and Blockchain Distribution Are Different Things　　A tokenized fund usually changes how the investors ownership interest is represented. The fund share or a mirror of that share exists on blockchain infrastructure.　　The FTIXX-Lynq model is different.　　The underlying fund remains inside conventional fund infrastructure.　　Lynq gives institutional crypto firms a new place to access it, move capital around their workflow and park idle cash between trades.　　That distinction matters because many institutions care more about workflow than token format.　　If a trading firm can move cash efficiently, earn Treasury yield and redeploy it quickly, it may not

2 دن پہلےانڈسٹری ریسرچ

Citi × Coinbase: Stablecoin Payments Become Invisible Banking Infrastructure

Stablecoins are becoming more useful by becoming less visible.　　Citi and Coinbase expanded their payments partnership on September 28 with two connected products that blur the boundary between a bank account and a stablecoin wallet.　　First, Coinbase is using Citis Virtual Account Wallet infrastructure to power Coinbase Virtual Accounts. Businesses can accept, hold and pay fiat through an account-like interface, while incoming fiat can be automatically converted into stablecoins underneath.　　Second, Citis institutional clients can accept stablecoin payments through Spring by Citi. The merchant does not need to hold or manage the stablecoin. Coinbase handles the digital-asset payment rail and converts the stablecoin into fiat, while Citi settles the fiat as the bank of record.　　This is more important than another merchant announcing “crypto payments.” It shows how stablecoins can enter mainstream finance without requiring the end user to behave like a crypto user.The User Interface Is Becoming Currency-Agnostic　　Most businesses do not want to manage two treasury systems — one for fiat and another for stablecoins. They want money to arrive, move and settle.　　The Citi-Coinbase model abstracts the asset type. A Coinbase customer can receive fiat into a virtual account and automatically convert it into stablecoins. A Citi merchant can receive a stablecoin payment

2 دن پہلےانڈسٹری ریسرچ

Chainlink CCIP 2.0: Why Cross-Chain Security Is Becoming Configurable Infrastructure

Cross-chain infrastructure is moving away from a simple question — “which bridge is secure？” — toward a more complicated one: who gets to define the security model for each transfer？　　Chainlink launched CCIP 2.0 on September 28 with a new architecture aimed at institutions, asset issuers and applications that want more control over how cross-chain transactions are verified, screened and finalized.　　The most important new feature is the Cross-Chain Verifier, or CCV. CCIP already uses a default Committee Verifier made up of 16 independent node operators. CCIP 2.0 lets an issuer or application add another verification layer on top of that default network. An institution can operate its own CCV or select an independent third-party verifier, and a destination-chain transaction can be configured so that both the default verifier and additional CCV must sign before execution.　　That changes the responsibility model for bridges.Cross-Chain Security Is Becoming Additive　　Many bridge designs force users into one security assumption. The bridge has one validator set, signer group or message-verification system. If that layer fails, every application using the bridge inherits the failure.　　CCIP 2.0 takes a layered approach: base verification + application-defined verification. The security improvement depends on genuine independence. Two verifiers hosted on the same infrastructure, operated

2 دن پہلےانڈسٹری ریسرچ

Silver Price Forecast: XAG/USD drops to near $60.50 amid surging oil, Treasury yields

Silver price (XAG/USD) continues to lose ground after registering over 5% losses in the previous day, trading around $60.60 per troy ounce during Asian hours on Tuesday. Non-yielding Silver price declined as ongoing uncertainty surrounding US-Iran negotiations kept oil prices elevated. This persistent pressure on energy costs has heightened expectations that the Federal Reserve (Fed) will need to tighten monetary policy further to combat inflation.　　The surge in oil prices resumed after Iranian officials expressed doubt about reaching an agreement prior to the upcoming US midterm elections in November. The standstill follows US President Donald Trump‘s recent rejection of Tehran’s latest proposal, which stalled diplomatic momentum.　　Rising inflation concerns and expectations of additional rate increases pushed Treasury yields to fresh multi-year highs, creating headwinds for non-yielding assets like Silver. Following the central banks initial rate hike in three years earlier this month, money markets are currently pricing in roughly a 70% probability of another Federal Reserve rate increase in October.　　Discover more　　Blockchain news subscription　　Blockchain development services　　Crypto exchange reviews　　OIS curve shows investors still pricing in multiple Fed hikes　　Strategists at Rabobank highlight that positioning in US rates remains firmly tilted toward further tightening, with the bank noting that “the OIS curve suggests investors are still

2 دن پہلےانڈسٹری

...

1921

...

1000