Crypto Industry News & Market Trends

Just the Beginning: Ripple Director Teases More XRP Ledger Improvements Ahead

Vijay Khanna, RippleX Director of Engineering, shares progress made by the XRP Ledger AI red team, which culminated in the release of rippled version 3.1.3 while hinting at more improvements ahead.　　In a tweet, Khanna highlighted the tremendous amount of effort that went into ensuring the XRPL version 3.1.3 release could be safely deployed to mainnet.　　Khanna signals that the XRPL version 3.1.3 upgrade is the beginning, adding that there is still a lot more work ahead.　　You Might Also Like　　The XRPL 3.1.3 version included bug fixes and improvements to one amendment, “fixCleanup3_1_3”, a collection of fixes for NFTs, Permissioned Domains, Vaults, and the Lending Protocol.　　XRP Ledger AI-assisted red team reports progress　　Back in March, Ripple revealed the launch of a dedicated AI-assisted red team to continuously hunt for vulnerabilities in the XRP Ledger. Two months later, the team led by Ripple software engineer Mayukha Vadari shares a progress report on how the effort is structured, the kinds of bugs found, and lessons learned along the way.　　The red team combines several complementary techniques with the aim of catching different classes of bugs.　　To date, the team has publicly disclosed 287 xrpld issues on GitHub (231 open, 49 closed), with more issues regularly created as triage

05-30Industry

Uniswap Price Slides As Binance Absorbs Millions Of Tokens – Traders Are Watching

Uniswap is struggling to reclaim higher levels as selling pressure keeps the price retreating from the levels that briefly offered hope of a sustained recovery. The weakness is visible and the direction is uncomfortably clear — but a CryptoQuant analysis tracking Binance exchange flows has identified a shift in UNIs flow dynamics so extreme that it demands attention regardless of where one sits on the directional debate.　　The 7-day average Binance Netflow for UNI has turned sharply positive at +145,829 UNI — a deviation of 6,019% above the three-month baseline. To put that figure in context: this is not a moderate acceleration in exchange deposits. It is one of the most extreme inflow accelerations recorded in UNIs recent on-chain history, concentrated into a window where the price is already moving lower rather than higher.　　The scale becomes more alarming at the individual session level. On May 25, Binance received a single-day inflow spike of 1.8 million UNI. On May 27, that figure exceeded 3.1 million UNI in a single session. Two days. Nearly five million UNI were arriving on the worlds largest exchange while the price was sliding from above $4.20 toward $3.10.　　The inflow surge is not retail-driven noise. Total inflow volume

05-30Industry

SBI Remit Hits $15B in Transfers With XRP Integration

SBI Remit Tops $15B in Transfers as XRP-Powered Payments Move Into Real-World Scale　　SBI Remit has announced a , with cumulative international money transfers processed through its platform surpassing 2.5 trillion yen, roughly $15 billion.　　This achievement underscores both the steady demand for cross-border remittance services and the companys growing role in modernizing global payments for foreign residents in Japan.　　SBI Remit primarily serves expatriates and migrant workers who rely on fast and affordable ways to send money to families and businesses abroad.　　In traditional banking systems, these transfers often involve multiple intermediaries, high fees, and delays that can stretch over several days. SBI Remit has positioned itself as a more efficient alternative by leveraging blockchain-based infrastructure.　　A key driver of this efficiency is its long-running partnership with Ripple. Since 2017, SBI Remit has used , Ripples global payments network designed to streamline cross-border transactions with faster settlement times and improved transparency compared to traditional correspondent banking.　　This in 2021 when SBI Remit became the first company in Japan to introduce international remittance services powered by On-Demand Liquidity (ODL).　　ODL uses XRP as a bridge asset, allowing value to move across borders without requiring institutions to pre-fund accounts in destination countries. Instead, liquidity is sourced in real

05-30Industry

From Activity Metrics to Board-Grade Reporting: Using Outset Media Index for Quarterly Media Reviews

A quarterly media report for board review explains how media visibility supports the companys strategic position, what communications activities changed during the quarter, and where media-related risks may affect future plans.　　Boards do not need a simple list of placements. They need to know whether the company is becoming more visible in the right outlets, reaching the right audiences, and managing reputation risk.　　Outset Media Index (OMI) is a media intelligence platform that analyzes outlet performance through structured metrics.　　For a quarterly board report, it gives comms leads the outlet-level data foundation they need to explain media position, operational progress, and risk without relying only on placement counts.　　What Should a Board-Level PR Report Show？　　A board-level PR report should answer three questions:Where does the company stand in the market conversation？What changed this quarter because of communications work？What risks or concentration patterns should leadership watch？　　This is different from a campaign report. A campaign report may focus on deliverables: number of placements, reach, traffic, links, interviews, or social pickup. A board report should connect media performance to strategic posture.　　For example, a board does not only need to know that the company appeared in ten publications. It needs to know whether those outlets improved credibility, reached the

05-30Industry

DOT Price Prediction: $1.35 Target Within 14 Days as Smart Money Accumulates

The charts are painting a picture of exhausted selling pressure reaching a critical inflection point. With DOT hovering at $1.22 and the RSI sitting in neutral territory at 42.38, were seeing classic oversold bounce conditions developing. The MACD histogram flatlined at zero signals that bearish momentum has completely stalled out, while the Bollinger Band position of 0.19 puts price perilously close to the lower band support at $1.18.　　This technical setup screams capitulation washout. When you see price hugging the lower Bollinger Band with momentum indicators going sideways rather than diving deeper, smart money typically starts positioning for the reversal. The fact that Blockchain.news has been tracking similar setups across the altcoin space suggests this isnt isolated DOT weakness but broader market fatigue.　　Volume & Price Alignment　　The derivatives data tells the real story here. DOT‘s funding rate sits neutral at 0.0046%, which means there’s no excessive speculation driving price action in either direction. More telling is the stark divergence between retail and institutional positioning – while retail traders maintain a 65% long bias, the top traders (smart money) have pushed their long exposure to nearly 69%.　　Hourly candlesticks (about 96 bars), same endpoint as our cryptocurrency price pages. Numbers below refresh from 1-minute

05-30Industry

Hyperliquid ‘Binance 2.0’? Debate Grows Over HYPE

Hyperliquid debate splits critics and supporters over “Binance 2.0” claims and innovation.Supporters cite strong revenue, volume, and institutional backing as proof of real product-market fit.HYPE keeps hitting new highs, with analysts eyeing $70–$80 if momentum continues.　　A heated debate has emerged over the long-term future of Hyperliquid (HYPE). Critics argue the fast-growing decentralized trading platform is little more than “Binance 2.0.” Supporters, however, say it has already become one of cryptos biggest success stories.　　Notably, the discussion gained attention after crypto commentator DeFi Monk explained why Hyperliquids regulatory challenges could actually create a major investment opportunity.　　Investment Opportunity in Regulatory Challenges　　DeFi Monk said Hyperliquid still has significant growth potential even without access to the U.S. market. He argued that the platform could still perform well because it targets the global CFDs market, which handles around $1 trillion in daily trading volume.　　He added that the upside would increase significantly if regulations become more favorable in the future. He also pointed to growing support from major industry players, including Coinbase, Circle, Paradigm, Grayscale, and Bitwise.　　Overall, he believes Hyperliquid‘s risk-reward profile remains strong. “If this doesn’t work, then Hyperliquid is basically just what it is today, and it can still be a secular grower,” he said.

05-30Industry

From Activity Metrics to Board-Grade Reporting: Using Outset Media Index for Quarterly Media Reviews

A quarterly media report for board review explains how media visibility supports the companys strategic position, what communications activities changed during the quarter, and where media-related risks may affect future plans.　　Boards do not need a simple list of placements. They need to know whether the company is becoming more visible in the right outlets, reaching the right audiences, and managing reputation risk.　　Outset Media Index (OMI) is a media intelligence platform that analyzes outlet performance through structured metrics.　　For a quarterly board report, it gives comms leads the outlet-level data foundation they need to explain media position, operational progress, and risk without relying only on placement counts.　　What Should a Board-Level PR Report Show？　　A board-level PR report should answer three questions:Where does the company stand in the market conversation？What changed this quarter because of communications work？What risks or concentration patterns should leadership watch？　　This is different from a campaign report. A campaign report may focus on deliverables: number of placements, reach, traffic, links, interviews, or social pickup. A board report should connect media performance to strategic posture.　　For example, a board does not only need to know that the company appeared in ten publications. It needs to know whether those outlets improved credibility, reached the

05-30Industry

Hyperliquid ‘Binance 2.0’? Debate Grows Over HYPE

Hyperliquid debate splits critics and supporters over “Binance 2.0” claims and innovation.Supporters cite strong revenue, volume, and institutional backing as proof of real product-market fit.HYPE keeps hitting new highs, with analysts eyeing $70–$80 if momentum continues.　　A heated debate has emerged over the long-term future of Hyperliquid (HYPE). Critics argue the fast-growing decentralized trading platform is little more than “Binance 2.0.” Supporters, however, say it has already become one of cryptos biggest success stories.　　Notably, the discussion gained attention after crypto commentator DeFi Monk explained why Hyperliquids regulatory challenges could actually create a major investment opportunity.　　Investment Opportunity in Regulatory Challenges　　DeFi Monk said Hyperliquid still has significant growth potential even without access to the U.S. market. He argued that the platform could still perform well because it targets the global CFDs market, which handles around $1 trillion in daily trading volume.　　He added that the upside would increase significantly if regulations become more favorable in the future. He also pointed to growing support from major industry players, including Coinbase, Circle, Paradigm, Grayscale, and Bitwise.　　Overall, he believes Hyperliquid‘s risk-reward profile remains strong. “If this doesn’t work, then Hyperliquid is basically just what it is today, and it can still be a secular grower,” he said.

05-30Industry

Alephium Bridge Hacked for $815,000 in 7 Minutes as Compromised Guardian Keys Enable Forged Token Transfers

The token is down approximately 1.3% over the past 24 hours, a measured response from the market given the circumstances, though one that partly reflects the contained nature of the exploit. The attack targets the bridge specifically, not the underlying Alephium chain, which continues to operate without disruption.　　The more lasting damage sits in the 13.76 million wrapped ALPH now circulating without collateral backing. Those tokens represent a liability that cannot simply be wished away. Any future bridge restart will need to account for that uncollateralized supply and the questions it raises about redemption, burn mechanisms, and user trust in wrapped assets on the Ethereum side.　　The bridge is down and the attacker has not moved the funds. Whether that pause is strategic or simply the beginning of a longer laundering process remains to be seen. What the Alephium team needs to do now is straightforward, even if it is not easy: publish a full technical post-mortem, clarify the discrepancy between its early event-emission characterization and the key compromise evidence, and lay out a concrete plan for how the bridge gets rebuilt, with a guardian set large enough to actually provide security.　　A four-guardian bridge with a three-of-four signing threshold is not a

05-30Industry

DOT Price Prediction: $1.35 Target Within 14 Days as Smart Money Accumulates

DOTs Technical Reality Check　　The charts are painting a picture of exhausted selling pressure reaching a critical inflection point. With DOT hovering at $1.22 and the RSI sitting in neutral territory at 42.38, were seeing classic oversold bounce conditions developing. The MACD histogram flatlined at zero signals that bearish momentum has completely stalled out, while the Bollinger Band position of 0.19 puts price perilously close to the lower band support at $1.18.　　This technical setup screams capitulation washout. When you see price hugging the lower Bollinger Band with momentum indicators going sideways rather than diving deeper, smart money typically starts positioning for the reversal. The fact that Blockchain.news has been tracking similar setups across the altcoin space suggests this isnt isolated DOT weakness but broader market fatigue.　　Volume & Price Alignment　　The derivatives data tells the real story here. DOT‘s funding rate sits neutral at 0.0046%, which means there’s no excessive speculation driving price action in either direction. More telling is the stark divergence between retail and institutional positioning – while retail traders maintain a 65% long bias, the top traders (smart money) have pushed their long exposure to nearly 69%.　　Hourly candlesticks (about 96 bars), same endpoint as our cryptocurrency price pages. Numbers below

05-30Industry