Crypto Exchange Review: Is It Safe? Fees, App & Ranking

Crypto Exchange

3.14

Within 1 year

Not Regulated

Exchange

Questionable Regulatory License

No Regulatory License

Be aware of the risks!

Basic Information

Country/Region

United Kingdom

Exchange AbbreviationCrypto Exchange

Emailinfo@cryptotocrypto.exchange

Operating PeriodWithin 1 year

Websitehttps://cryptotocrypto.exchange/

0.00/10

Score

Regulation

Risk Control

Business

Reputation

Tech

RiskNotice

2 risk alerts

High Risk 1

Medium Risk 1

Exchange Overview

Strong encryption protects every transfer on our instant cryptocurrency exchange, so your funds and details stay shielded throughout each swap.

News

WikiBit Exchange Exit Risk Ranking #18: Poloniex — How Did the 12-Year “Living Fossil” of the Crypto Industry Become a “Top Wanted Target” in the Eyes of Regulators?

Preface: The Two Sides of a “Legacy Brand”　　In the previous 17 editions, we investigated a series of exchanges ranging from HashKey to BigONE. Today, in the 18th edition, we turn our attention to a true “ancient beast” of the crypto world — Poloniex.　　Its résumé could be described as a “living fossil among crypto exchanges”:　　“Founded in 2014,” “12 years of operating history,” “one of the earliest exchanges to introduce Proof of Reserves (PoR),” “maintaining a reserve ratio above 100% for 20 consecutive months,” “a $100 million user protection fund,” “daily trading volume exceeding $1.1 billion in April 2026, surpassing Bitget and MEXC,” “supporting more than 350 cryptocurrencies” — doesnt that sound like the perfect image of a “long-established and reliable major exchange”？　　But on the other side of the story:　　The Seychelles Financial Services Authority (FSA) issued a public warning in March 2026, stating that the company operating Poloniex had already been dissolved on January 1, 2022, and was no longer a legitimate legal entity.　　The U.S. SEC previously fined Poloniex $10 million, accusing it of knowingly operating an unregistered securities trading platform.　　Indias Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU-IND) ordered Poloniex to be blocked for violating anti-money laundering regulations.　　Trustpilot gave Poloniex a score of only 2.0/5,

09-07Deep Dive

WikiBit Exchange Exit Scam Risk Report #16 — Hibt: MSB “Sticker Compliance” + 3 Million Users, How Did a “Data Giant” Become a Withdrawal Black Hole?

Introduction: A “Split-Personality” Exchange With Impressive Data and Extremely Difficult Withdrawals　　In the previous 15 editions, we investigated a series of exchanges ranging from HashKey to OrangeX. For the 16th edition, we are looking at one of the most “split-personality” platforms in the crypto industry — Hibt.　　Its resume sounds almost like a crypto “humblebrag” masterpiece:“Registered in Canada in 2021”“Headquartered in Dubai, with operations across Japan, South Korea, and other regions”“Holding Canadian and U.S. MSB registrations”“470+ cryptocurrencies and 500+ trading pairs”“Ranked among the global top 50 exchanges on CoinMarketCap, with over $1 billion in 24-hour spot trading volume”“90% of assets stored in cold wallets”“200+ professional employees”“Serving more than 3 million users worldwide”　　At first glance, this sounds like a platform with the configuration of a top-10 global exchange.　　But on the other side:WikiBit rating: 6.06/10, labeled “No Effective Regulation”Trustpilot rating: 2.2/5, with users openly calling it a “SCAM”Some users report that withdrawal applications have remained under review for more than two months, with funds never returned　　So how did a “data giant” claiming billions in trading volume become a “withdrawal black hole” in users eyes？　　Today, we break it down layer by layer.1. Regulatory Compliance: An MSB Is a “Sticker,” Not a Real License　　Hibts “Compliance Package”

09-03Deep Dive

WikiBit Exchange Exit Scam Risk Ranking #15: OrangeX — Can Two “Compliance Stickers” (Czech VASP + US MSB) Cover Up a Screen Full of “SCAM” Allegations?

Introduction: An Exchange with “Schrödingers Compliance”　　In the previous 14 editions, we investigated a series of exchanges ranging from HashKey to Echobit. In this 15th edition, we take a deep dive into what appears to be a “compliance packaging expert” — OrangeX.　　On paper, OrangeX has an impressive résumé:“Czech VASP license + US MSB registration”“Completed $30 million in funding” ($10 million Series A + $20 million Series B)“Top 50 ranked on CoinMarketCap”“Over $1.5 billion in 24-hour trading volume”“Publicly verifiable Proof of Reserves (PoR)”　　Sounds like a rising star in the regulated crypto industry, right？　　But on the other side:The Seychelles Financial Services Authority (FSA) issued a public warning on October 15, 2025, stating that OrangeX “is not currently authorized” and “has not submitted any application”;Trustpilot gives OrangeX only 1.4/5, with users repeatedly calling it a “SCAM EXCHANGE”;WikiBits risk assessment shows “no confirmed regulation” and “questionable regulatory status”;Users have reported account freezes, blocked withdrawals, and being forced to sign agreements waiving their rights.　　So how can an exchange claiming to hold a “Czech VASP + US MSB dual compliance structure” be publicly questioned by the Seychelles FSA？　　Today, we will break it down layer by layer.1. Regulatory Compliance: Two “Compliance Stickers” Shattered by a Seychelles FSA Warning　　The

09-03Deep Dive