Solana's Alpenglow Hits Second Testnet, 100ms Finality in Sight

Lời nói đầu:Key TakeawaysSolana switched on Alpenglow on testnet Sept. 24 and devnet Sept. 25, replacing its old TowerBFT system with Votor.Alpenglow aims to cut

Key Takeaways

  • Solana switched on Alpenglow on testnet Sept. 24 and devnet Sept. 25, replacing its old TowerBFT system with Votor.
  • Alpenglow aims to cut Solanas finality time from 12.8 seconds to just 100-150 milliseconds.
  • Anza hasnt set a mainnet launch date yet, and Firedancer and Frankendancer still need to add Votor support.

Solana Retires Its Old Consensus Engine on Two Public Networks

Solana just pulled off something that would have sounded like science fiction in its early days. Its Alpenglow consensus overhaul is now operating on two public test networks, with a design targeting irreversible settlement in roughly one-tenth of a second.

Image source: X

That‘s a far cry from the approximately 12.8 seconds the network currently needs for economic finality. Co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko celebrated the devnet countdown with five words. “You are not ready for this.” Yet the real test is still ahead, and the machinery responsible for securing billions in assets hasn’t made the switch.

TowerBFT Gets the Ax After a 17-Minute Countdown

Anza, the outfit behind Solanas Agave validator client, activated Alpenglow on public testnet Sept. 24. Following a 5,000-slot countdown lasting approximately 17 minutes, the transition finished at slot 444,625,255. The final TowerBFT block carried 82% of stake. An Alpenglow genesis block followed, retiring the previous consensus system on that cluster and handing finalization duties to Votor.

Discover more

Finance

Daily crypto news

Blockchain development tools

Devnet joined the party Sept. 25, completing its transition at slot 504,148,999. These werent entirely fresh experiments, either. A dedicated community cluster has rehearsed the change since May, including an unsuccessful early attempt that required a restart. The core protocol, SIMD-0326, received governance approval in September 2025 with 98.27% of participating votes.

From 12.8 Seconds to the Blink of an Eye

Here‘s where things get interesting. Solana’s existing system requires validators to submit votes as onchain transactions and wait through a 32-slot confirmation chain. Those voting transactions reportedly account for approximately 75% of network transaction counts. Votor moves voting offchain, collecting peer-to-peer votes into compact BLS certificates instead.

Two confirmation paths operate simultaneously.

  • Fast path: 80% of stake agrees in one round, targeting 100 milliseconds.
  • Fallback: 60% agrees initially, followed by another round, targeting 150 milliseconds.

The trade-off is a revised security model accommodating 20% adversarial stake and another 20% offline. Rotor, the planned replacement for Turbine block propagation, comes later. The Solana Virtual Machine, transaction format, programs and fees remain unchanged. Wallet users wont need to migrate anything.

Faster Finality Brings a Catch for Exchanges

Yakovenko‘s declaration carries a practical implication. Even if the Solana protocol settles transactions in 100 milliseconds, exchanges, bridges and custodians might still process deposits using systems designed around considerably longer confirmation periods. There’s another wrinkle. Removing validator votes from blocks will make reported transaction counts drop, even when actual user activity hasnt budged.

Image source: X

Anza is warning infrastructure providers to prepare. Indexers must distinguish competing candidate banks until final certification, while Geyser and gRPC consumers receive a new bank_id identifier. Solana Foundations Ilan Gitter cited more than 25,000 transactions per second with 150-millisecond finality on the testnet cluster following activation. A tidy figure, certainly, but one measured on a test cluster rather than mainnet.

Mainnet Still Has a Few Hurdles to Clear

The advertised 100-150 millisecond performance comes from simulations and smaller-scale testing. Sustained results across a full public validator set handling live market activity remain unproven. Client diversity presents another complication. Firedancer and Frankendancer havent implemented Votor, leaving the first public transitions dependent on Agave 4.3.

Anza wants developers testing integrations throughout an observation period before any mainnet-beta migration. No firm activation date has been announced. Sept. 28 appears in Agave schedules as a window for resuming feature activations, not a confirmed Alpenglow launch. For Solana, the proposition is straightforward enough. Transactions that currently require seconds to finalize might eventually settle in milliseconds. Whether the exchanges, custodians and infrastructure providers handling those transactions can keep pace is another matter entirely.

Miễn trừ trách nhiệm

Các ý kiến ​​trong bài viết này chỉ thể hiện quan điểm cá nhân của tác giả và không phải lời khuyên đầu tư. Thông tin trong bài viết mang tính tham khảo và không đảm bảo tính chính xác tuyệt đối. Nền tảng không chịu trách nhiệm cho bất kỳ quyết định đầu tư nào được đưa ra dựa trên nội dung này.
Bài viết trước

Michael Saylor muốn Bitcoin xuất hiện trong các ngân hàng và hướng đến ngành tài sản số trị giá 100 nghìn tỷ USD

Bài tiếp theo

Grayscale nộp đơn cho Zcash ETF trả thưởng mỗi 2 tuần: Có gì cần lưu ý?