Prediction markets should dial back faulty filings for incentives to boost trading: CFTC

요약:The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission issued new guidance warning prediction markets about their incentive programs. The regulator said firms must file properly and avoid rewards that could encourage misconduct. Many filings are “procedurally or substantively deficient,” making it hard to assess compliance. The CFTC flagged high-volume trading rewards that push participants to trade solely to hit targets, increasing risks of wash-trading, pre-arranged trading, and other fraudulent practices. It also criticized market-maker programs that guarantee net profits or cover losses through stipends and rebates, warning these could promote manipulation and disruptive behavior.

Summary

  • The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission issued more guidance to warn prediction markets platforms about how theyre managing their incentives programs.
  • The firms need to file properly and avoid programs that could incentivize bad behavior, the agency said.

Like any regulated trading platform under authority of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, prediction markets firms try to encourage heavy traders and for firms to act as market makers in ways that can deepen participation and trading volume. But the CFTC is concerned about how they're doing it, according to guidance issued on Wednesday.

The U.S. derivatives regulator cautioned the event-contracts platforms that it's seeing an increase in their filings in pursuit of incentive programs, and they are often “procedurally or substantively deficient,” the document said. That hinders the agency from figuring out whether the platform “has provided adequate notice of the terms of the program and sufficiently evaluated the programs compliance.”

The CFTC is seeing some of the features of these rewards programs “present compliance concerns.” Some of the rewards for high-volume participants can encourage them “to trade solely to reach volume targets, heightening risks of wash-trading, pre-arranged trading, or other fraudulent, manipulative, or disruptive trading practices.”

And market-maker programs, in which firms are encouraged to handle either side of a market, have been guaranteeing net process or to cover losses “through stipends and rebates,” which the regulator warned could also encourage fraudulent behavior and market manipulation.

면책 성명

본 기사의 견해는 저자의 개인적 견해일 뿐이며 본 플랫폼은 투자 권고를 하지 않습니다. 본 플랫폼은 기사 내 정보의 정확성, 완전성, 적시성을 보장하지 않으며, 개인의 기사 내 정보에 의한 손실에 대해 책임을 지지 않습니다.
전편

모건 스탠리의 인프라 파트너 제로해시, 미국 신탁은행 지정 추진 실패

다음

BofA 임원, 7월 CPI 후 연준 3회 인상 주장