Bitcoin ETF inflows surge after Coldcard hack, but link is unclear: Bloomberg analyst

요약:Demand for US spot Bitcoin ETFs has accelerated since the Coldcard wallet hack, with five funds—including BlackRock‘s IBIT and Fidelity’s FBTC—posting daily inflows totaling roughly $620 million. Bloomberg analyst Eric Balchunas noted uncertainty about any direct connection but suggested some investors may eventually shift away from self-custody. The exploit drained over $116 million in Bitcoin from more than 5,200 addresses, renewing debate over hardware wallet vulnerabilities versus institutional custody. Binance co-founder Changpeng Zhao argued centralized exchanges may now be “statistically safer,” citing cumulative self-custody losses, though he acknowledged such incidents are underreported. The discussion comes amid rising AI-assisted attacks, which also prompted Bitcoin swap service Boltz to suspend its non-custodial bridge.

Demand for US spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) has accelerated over the past week, with a string of daily inflows coinciding with the Coldcard wallet hack — timing that has prompted speculation about whether some investors are reconsidering self-custody.

According to Bloomberg senior ETF analyst Eric Balchunas, BlackRock‘s iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT), Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC), Bitwise Bitcoin ETF (BITB), ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF (ARKB) as well as Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF (MSBT) have recorded inflows every trading day since the weekend exploit, totaling roughly $620 million. The cumulative figure is consistent with Cointelegraph’s recent reporting on the ETF inflow streak.

The Coldcard exploit drained more than $116 million worth of Bitcoin from over 5,200 wallet addresses, according to blockchain intelligence firm TRM Labs.

“I‘m not saying it’s connected, we just don‘t know,” Balchunas said in a post on X. “[Although] long-term I can’t imagine there arent some who migrate over.”

Source: Eric Balchunas

Related: Bitcoin Red Team reports 5K findings in sweeping security audit

Coldcard exploit renews debate over self-custody risks

The Coldcard hack renewed concerns that even hardware wallet users can be exposed to firmware flaws and software vulnerabilities, highlighting the operational risks that come with self-custody.

The incident also reignited debate over the trade-offs between holding Bitcoin directly and gaining exposure through regulated investment products such as spot Bitcoin ETFs, where asset custody and security are handled by institutional providers.

Binance co-founder Changpeng “CZ” Zhao also weighed in on the debate, arguing that storing crypto on centralized exchanges may now be “statistically safer” than self-custody, citing data from analyst Willy Woo that cumulative Bitcoin losses from self-custody incidents have surpassed those from exchange hacks.

Source: Changpeng Zhao

“Hack data is easier to collect on the CEX side, usually major news. It is harder on the self-custody side, where hacks, lost coins, etc are often not reported,” CZ said.

The debate comes as AI-assisted cyberattacks are becoming increasingly sophisticated. On Monday, Bitcoin swap service Boltz suspended its non-custodial bridge, citing a steady rise in AI-assisted exploits that were allowing attackers to identify and exploit vulnerabilities faster than its team could patch them.

Magazine: Do the Coldcard attacks mean all hardware wallets are now insecure?

면책 성명

본 기사의 견해는 저자의 개인적 견해일 뿐이며 본 플랫폼은 투자 권고를 하지 않습니다. 본 플랫폼은 기사 내 정보의 정확성, 완전성, 적시성을 보장하지 않으며, 개인의 기사 내 정보에 의한 손실에 대해 책임을 지지 않습니다.
전편

비트코인의 낮은 변동성이 반드시 낮은 위험을 의미하지는 않는다

다음

아폴로, 엔화 수십년 법칙 깨졌다 밝혀