Deepcoin Review 2026: Derivatives, Fees and Account Risks

Deepcoin is built more like a derivatives trading workstation than a simple place to buy and hold crypto.

Its product emphasizes perpetual futures, flexible position management, copy trading, strategy tools and APIs. Traders can use USDT-margined or coin-margined contracts, choose cross or isolated margin, maintain split or merged positions and access market, funding, leverage and position data programmatically.

That makes Deepcoin potentially useful for experienced derivatives traders.

It also makes the platform harder to evaluate through a conventional exchange checklist.

Execution fees are only one part of the cost. Funding, leverage and liquidation can matter substantially more. Account structure also needs to be understood correctly: Deepcoin's newer unified-balance tools can display equity across Funding, Spot, USDT Swap, Coin-margined Swap, Copy Trading, Robot and other sections, but those account categories do not automatically form one universal collateral pool. Cross-margin exposure applies according to the trading mode and product being used.

There is also a significant regulatory development that cannot be omitted from a 2026 review.

On July 5, 2026, the Seychelles Financial Services Authority issued a public warning concerning Deepcoin, stating that an entity it identified as DC Group Ltd., formerly DEEPCOIN Global Limited, had not been authorized under Seychelles' Virtual Asset Service Providers Act 2024. The regulator also said it had not received a VASP application from the entity at the time of the notice.

That warning does not establish that every Deepcoin transaction is fraudulent or that customer assets have been lost. It does mean users should be much more careful with broad claims that Deepcoin is “licensed in multiple countries” and verify the exact entity and activity behind any registration.

The same precision is needed with reserves. Deepcoin currently promotes CoinMarketCap reserve data and Cobo custody, but that is not the same thing as a customer-verifiable Merkle-tree proof showing both exchange assets and user liabilities.

For Deepcoin in 2026, the core due-diligence questions are therefore unusually specific: What fee does the actual account pay？ Which balances are exposed to a leveraged position？ What regulatory entity serves the account？ And what exactly does the published reserve evidence prove？

Deepcoin is primarily a derivatives platform

Deepcoin supports ordinary spot trading, but many of its most distinctive features are designed around perpetual contracts.

Its API currently recognizes both:

• SPOT
• SWAP

and its derivatives infrastructure supports USDT-margined and coin-margined contracts.

Trading modes include:

• cross margin;
• isolated margin;
• long and short positions;
• merged positions;
• split positions.

Deepcoin also supports take-profit and stop-loss controls, conditional orders, leverage settings and position-history queries.

This matters when deciding who the platform is actually built for.

A user who only wants to purchase BTC and withdraw it to a personal wallet does not benefit much from split-position management or advanced derivatives APIs.

A trader managing multiple perpetual strategies might.

The platform should therefore be evaluated first as a leveraged trading system and second as a conventional spot exchange.

Deepcoin's fee API is more useful than a static headline

Deepcoin made an important API change on May 28, 2026 by introducing an endpoint that returns the trading fee applicable to the current account.

The endpoint can query fees by:

• product type;
• individual instrument;
• instrument family;
• account fee tier.

It separately returns maker and taker rates for the relevant product.

That is useful because a single Deepcoin fee quoted in an article can be misleading.

Deepcoin's official API documentation includes an example for an Lv1 USDT perpetual account showing:

• Maker: 0.02%
• Taker: 0.05%

But this is an API response example, not a guarantee that every user and every perpetual market receives those rates.

Deepcoin has also run promotional and pair-specific fee programs. For example, its 2025 negative-maker campaign referred to platform default contract rates of 0.04% maker and 0.06% taker for certain pairs when promotional pricing ended.

The safest approach in 2026 is therefore:

Use the fee displayed for the actual account and instrument rather than applying one rate to every Deepcoin trade.

Why the 0.02% / 0.05% figure needs context

Suppose an account actually receives the 0.02% maker and 0.05% taker rates shown in Deepcoin's API example.

A $100,000 taker order would generate:

$100,000 × 0.05% = $50

Closing another $100,000 of notional as a taker would generate another:

$50

The nominal round-trip execution fee would therefore be approximately:

$100

The critical word is notional.

If the trader uses $5,000 of margin to control a $100,000 position, fees are not calculated only against the $5,000 deposited as collateral.

They apply to the executed position size.

Leverage can therefore make a trading fee look small as a percentage while producing a much larger charge relative to the capital actually committed.

Spot fees should also be checked separately

Deepcoin's current API distinguishes spot and swap fee queries rather than treating them as one schedule.

Current external fee databases that track Deepcoin's published schedule generally report standard spot pricing around:

• 0.10% maker
• 0.10% taker

but the logged-in Deepcoin fee information should take precedence because account, campaign or instrument pricing can differ.

The important point is that the perpetual example of 0.02% maker / 0.05% taker should not be copied into the spot section.

Spot and derivatives are different products with different fee structures.

Funding can cost more than execution

Perpetual contracts do not expire like traditional futures contracts.

Instead, funding payments help keep the perpetual price aligned with the underlying index.

Deepcoin's API exposes:

• current funding rate;
• settlement interval;
• next settlement time;
• historical funding rates.

The settlement interval is product-specific.

The API example shows an eight-hour interval for BTC-USDT and ETH-USDT, while other Deepcoin documentation shows that some contracts can use different intervals.

That distinction matters for automated strategies.

A trader holding a position through repeated funding periods can pay substantially more in funding than in maker/taker fees.

The true cost of a perpetual position is therefore closer to:

Opening fee + closing fee + funding + spread + slippage

rather than just the advertised taker percentage.

Leverage magnifies fees and losses differently

Leverage does not reduce the notional size of a position.

It reduces the amount of margin required to support that position.

Suppose a trader opens:

$100,000 notional position

using:

$5,000 margin

The effective leverage is roughly:

20×

A 1% move in the underlying represents approximately $1,000 of movement on the $100,000 position before other factors.

Relative to the $5,000 margin, that is already a 20% move in the trader's committed capital.

The same principle applies to trading costs.

Even a seemingly small execution fee can become material relative to the margin supporting a leveraged position.

This is why comparing derivatives exchanges purely on maker/taker fees can be misleading.

Mark price matters more than the last trade during liquidation

Deepcoin's position data distinguishes information including:

• average entry price;
• last price;
• liquidation price;
• leverage;
• used margin;
• unrealized profit.

For derivatives traders, liquidation mechanics are more important than the last traded price displayed on a chart.

A perpetual exchange normally uses a mark-price or risk-price mechanism to reduce the likelihood that a single abnormal transaction immediately liquidates positions.

That does not prevent liquidation.

It changes the price input used by the risk engine.

Before opening a position, traders need to know:

• entry price;
• leverage;
• maintenance margin;
• liquidation price;
• mark price;
• position notional;
• collateral.

A stop-loss order also should not be confused with guaranteed execution.

When the trigger is reached, Deepcoin can place the corresponding order, but an actual fill still depends on available market liquidity. Deepcoin's API supports trigger orders based on last, index or mark price and can submit either market or limit orders after triggering.

During fast volatility, the final execution can therefore differ from the trigger price.

Deepcoin's “unified account” needs careful wording

Deepcoin expanded its account API in June 2026 with a Unified Account Balances endpoint.

It can retrieve balances across:

• Funding;
• Spot;
• USDT Swap;
• Coin-margined Swap;
• Bonus;
• Rebate;
• Event Contract;
• Copy Trading;
• Robot accounts.

The response can include available balance, frozen balance, unrealized profit, equity and USD-equivalent equity.

This is useful for portfolio monitoring and API-based risk systems.

But “unified balance query” should not be translated into:

Every dollar anywhere in the Deepcoin account automatically collateralizes every leveraged position.

That is not what the API documentation establishes.

Deepcoin still identifies distinct account types, and its trading API separately supports cross and isolated margin modes.

The distinction is important.

Cross margin is where loss contagion becomes relevant

Under cross margin, eligible collateral can support the broader position or positions within the applicable margin structure.

That improves capital efficiency.

It also means more capital can be exposed when a position moves against the trader.

Suppose a trader mentally assigns:

• $2,000 to BTC;
• $2,000 to ETH;
• $6,000 as “unused balance.”

If those funds are actually available inside the same applicable cross-margin structure, the risk engine may not respect the trader's mental accounting.

The important question is not whether the funds appear on one account dashboard.

It is whether they are recognized as collateral for the position.

Traders who want a stricter loss boundary should understand Deepcoin's isolated-margin option before opening the position.

Isolated margin gives a clearer position boundary

Deepcoin's order API explicitly supports:

• cross
• isolated

trading modes.

In isolated margin, the amount assigned to a position is more clearly separated from other available collateral.

That does not make the trade safe.

The entire isolated allocation can still be lost.

What it does is help prevent one position from consuming a larger pool of collateral merely to avoid liquidation.

For traders running several unrelated strategies, that separation can be more valuable than maximizing capital efficiency.

Split and merged positions add another layer

Deepcoin also distinguishes between:

• merged positions
• split positions

and its 2026 V2 API includes dedicated functions for increasing and merging eligible split positions.

A merged-position model is useful when the trader wants a combined exposure to an instrument and direction.

Split positions allow different entries or strategies to be managed separately.

That can improve trade management, but it also makes risk tracking more complex.

A trader running several BTC long positions with different:

• leverage;
• entry prices;
• stop levels;
• strategy objectives;

should not rely only on total account equity when deciding how much risk is being taken.

Position-level margin and liquidation data remain important.

Deepcoin's V2 API is now a substantial part of the product

Deepcoin officially launched its V2 API on July 15, 2026.

The API covers:

• accounts;
• markets;
• trading;
• copy trading;
• internal transfers;
• subaccounts;
• affiliate functions;
• assets;
• public and private WebSockets.

Recent additions include:

• batch order placement;
• batch cancellation;
• batch order amendments;
• leverage queries;
• position history;
• subaccount creation;
• subaccount API-key management.

This is meaningful for systematic traders.

Deepcoin is not simply providing a basic REST endpoint for placing BTC orders.

Its API is designed to support much of the functionality needed for automated derivatives infrastructure.

That also creates operational risk.

API behavior changes, authentication, rate limits and position logic need to be tested before deploying significant capital.

API keys need stricter controls than ordinary logins

Deepcoin's API supports separate credentials consisting of:

• API key;
• secret key;
• passphrase.

Keys can also be restricted to IP addresses. Deepcoin says an API key with trading or withdrawal permissions that is not IP-bound can be automatically deleted after 30 days of inactivity.

For automated trading, a reasonable setup is to provide only the permissions required.

A trading strategy normally does not need withdrawal permission.

If withdrawal access is genuinely required, Deepcoin's API requires withdrawals to go to whitelist addresses.

That is an important security control.

It reduces the ability of a compromised API key to immediately route funds to an arbitrary new address.

Copy trading is still leveraged trading

Deepcoin's copy-trading system is integrated deeply enough that its API can identify whether a position is:

• a leader position;
• a copied position;
• a normal position.

The 2026 position API added isLeading and isFollow fields specifically for this purpose.

The copy-trading API also exposes information such as:

• leader positions;
• leverage;
• entry price;
• available position;
• margin;
• liquidation price.

That is a useful reminder of what is actually being copied.

The follower is not buying a managed fund.

The follower is replicating leveraged trading activity.

A leader's return is not a follower's return

Even if two accounts follow the same signal, their outcomes can differ.

Reasons include:

• execution delay;
• slippage;
• different account size;
• different leverage;
• available margin;
• funding timing;
• partial fills.

A leader can also have financial exposure outside the visible Deepcoin copy-trading account.

For example, a visible leveraged BTC long could be hedged by a position at another exchange.

A follower only copying the visible long would not inherit that hedge.

This is why leader statistics should not be treated as a complete portfolio record.

Useful metrics include:

• maximum drawdown;
• leverage;
• position concentration;
• trading history length;
• current open exposure.

Short-term return alone is particularly weak evidence when leverage is high.

Seychelles issued a specific warning about Deepcoin in July 2026

Regulation is now one of the most important sections of a Deepcoin review.

On July 5, 2026, the Financial Services Authority of Seychelles published a warning titled Unauthorised activity under the Virtual Asset Service Providers Act, 2024.

The regulator identified the Deepcoin platform and stated that it was allegedly operated by:

DC Group Ltd., formerly DEEPCOIN Global Limited

The FSA said that the company:

• does not have authorization under Seychelles' VASP Act 2024;
• had not previously held such authorization;
• had not submitted a VASP application to the Authority at the time of the notice.

The FSA also stated that the relevant entity had been incorporated on July 1, 2025.

This is materially more important than simply saying Deepcoin has “limited regulatory clarity.”

There is now a direct warning from a financial regulator associated with a jurisdiction linked to the platform.

What the Seychelles warning does — and does not — establish

The warning should not be exaggerated.

The Seychelles FSA did not say that:

• Deepcoin had stolen customer assets;
• every trade on the platform was fraudulent;
• the exchange was insolvent.

Its warning is specifically about authorization to operate as a VASP under Seychelles law.

That distinction matters.

But the warning also should not be minimized simply because Deepcoin references registrations elsewhere.

A company can hold an AML or money-services registration in one jurisdiction while lacking authorization to operate a crypto exchange or derivatives business in another.

Users need to match:

legal entity → jurisdiction → regulated activity → actual product used

rather than count license logos.

Older compliance claims need to be read in that context

Deepcoin's older material has cited registrations involving the United States and Canada and has described itself as holding multiple compliance licenses.

Its current homepage similarly states that it is “licensed in multiple countries” and connected to global KYC and AML systems.

Those claims should not be used to contradict the Seychelles FSA notice.

Registrations have different scopes.

For example, money-services registrations are generally focused heavily on AML, reporting and money-transmission obligations. They do not automatically authorize every leveraged crypto derivative offered globally.

The FSA warning illustrates exactly why the named company and regulated activity need to be verified individually.

Deepcoin does not currently serve U.S. users

Current Deepcoin materials state that services are not offered to users in the United States and other restricted jurisdictions.

Deepcoin repeated that limitation in September 2026 when announcing its stock-perpetual expansion, stating that those services were available only in supported jurisdictions and that Deepcoin does not offer products or services to U.S. users.

That is important when interpreting older references to a U.S. MSB registration.

An AML-related registration should not be read as proof that a U.S. resident can currently open a Deepcoin derivatives account.

Registration and customer eligibility are separate questions.

Users should check the current geographic restrictions before depositing rather than trying to bypass them with a VPN.

Deepcoin's reserve claim also needs tighter wording

Deepcoin's current homepage states:

“CMC reserve proof”

and says customer assets use Cobo custody. It also claims no crypto theft since establishment.

CoinMarketCap does currently display blockchain reserve information for Deepcoin.

That is useful asset-side evidence.

It allows observers to inspect crypto wallets attributed to the exchange and estimate the market value of those disclosed reserves.

But this should not be described as equivalent to a full Merkle-tree proof of reserves.

CMC reserve data primarily shows assets

A complete exchange reserve analysis has at least two sides:

Assets:

What cryptocurrency does the exchange control？

Liabilities:

How much cryptocurrency does it owe customers？

Wallet disclosures help with the first question.

They do not automatically answer the second.

If an exchange shows $500 million of identifiable wallets but owes customers $600 million within the relevant scope, the wallet number alone does not establish full backing.

Likewise, a platform can hold a large amount of BTC while having different obligations in USDT, ETH or derivatives collateral.

CoinMarketCap currently labels Deepcoin's reserve balances as reported directly by the exchange.

That makes the information useful, but its scope should not be overstated.

A customer-level liability proof would be stronger

A stronger PoR framework normally allows an individual customer to verify that their balance was included in the liabilities calculation, often using a Merkle tree.

For Deepcoin, the currently prominent public evidence is the CMC wallet-reserve disclosure, not a clearly surfaced customer-facing Merkle inclusion workflow comparable with some exchanges that provide a downloadable proof for each account.

That is an evidence gap.

It is not proof that Deepcoin lacks sufficient assets.

It means the public reserve claim supports a narrower conclusion:

Deepcoin has disclosed blockchain assets that can be externally observed.

It does not by itself prove:

All customer liabilities are fully represented and covered.

That distinction is particularly important on a derivatives-focused exchange.

Derivatives liabilities are more complicated than spot balances

On a simple spot exchange, a liability can often be conceptualized as:

Customer owns X BTC → platform should hold sufficient BTC

A derivatives exchange adds:

• unrealized profits;
• unrealized losses;
• collateral;
• funding receivables;
• funding payables;
• insurance mechanisms;
• liquidation balances.

That makes transparency around liabilities more important.

A wallet address alone cannot show whether every profitable trader's claim is fully represented in the exchange's internal accounting.

For Deepcoin, a more complete reserve disclosure would ideally provide:

• snapshot date;
• asset coverage;
• customer-liability methodology;
• treatment of derivatives P&L;
• treatment of collateral;
• Merkle root or equivalent customer-verification route;
• wallet ownership evidence;
• independent attestation scope.

Until then, CMC reserve data should be treated as useful but partial custody evidence.

Cobo custody is another separate layer

Deepcoin's homepage says it uses Cobo for custody and describes the arrangement as bank-grade security.

Third-party custody can improve key-management architecture because exchange trading infrastructure and underlying wallet controls do not necessarily need to reside in the same system.

It also creates another dependency.

Users evaluating the claim should distinguish:

Who operates the trading platform？

from

Who provides wallet custody technology？

A custody provider cannot remove all exchange risk.

For example, an account restriction, liquidation dispute or internal ledger error can affect the user even if the blockchain private keys themselves remain secure.

Custody security and exchange solvency are related but different questions.

Withdrawal infrastructure has useful controls

Deepcoin's current API provides detailed withdrawal configuration before a transaction is submitted.

Users can query:

• supported chains;
• withdrawal availability;
• withdrawable amount;
• limits;
• required precision;
• memo requirements;
• whitelist addresses.

API withdrawals are restricted to addresses already on the whitelist.

That is a useful control against certain forms of account compromise.

It also means automated users need to configure the withdrawal path before they need it.

A trading bot should not discover during an emergency that the destination wallet has never been approved.

Withdrawable balance and total equity are not the same thing

Deepcoin's API explicitly distinguishes available and withdrawable balances and can break them down by account type.

That distinction is particularly important for a derivatives user.

Some account equity may be supporting:

• open futures positions;
• pending orders;
• cross-margin requirements;
• bonus arrangements.

A trader looking at a large total equity number should not assume all of it can immediately be removed without affecting open positions.

Before withdrawing collateral:

• review current positions;
• check available margin;
• check liquidation prices;
• determine the actual withdrawable amount;
• confirm the intended blockchain;
• test a small withdrawal.

Removing collateral from a leveraged account can materially change liquidation risk.

Network selection remains a basic but serious risk

Crypto withdrawals require both platforms to support the same chain.

For example, sending USDT requires more information than simply selecting “USDT.”

The sender and receiver also need to agree on the network.

Deepcoin's withdrawal configuration exposes the valid chains for an asset and whether additional memo information is required.

The lowest-fee network is not automatically the correct one.

A cheap withdrawal on an unsupported chain can create a much larger recovery problem.

For significant transfers, send a test amount first.

Phishing has been active enough for Deepcoin to issue a warning

In April 2026, Deepcoin issued a specific warning about fraudulent websites impersonating the exchange.

It identified deepcoin.com as its official website and directed users to its official-verification tool for checking domains, emails, Telegram accounts and media identities.

That is particularly relevant for derivatives traders, who may receive unsolicited messages claiming to offer:

• account management;
• copy-trading access;
• VIP fee discounts;
• API configuration;
• withdrawal assistance.

A genuine support process should not require the customer to disclose a private key, seed phrase or API secret.

Nor should it require sending cryptocurrency to an unrelated address to “unlock” an existing withdrawal.

Deepcoin says it has had no crypto theft since launch

Deepcoin's homepage currently states that the platform has experienced zero coin theft since establishment.

That is a company claim rather than an independent guarantee.

There is no widely documented major central-wallet theft associated with Deepcoin comparable with some older exchange hacks.

That is relevant historical information.

But absence of a publicly reported wallet hack does not answer:

• regulatory authorization;
• solvency;
• counterparty risk;
• account freezes;
• derivatives losses;
• future security.

Security record should therefore remain one input rather than a substitute for the rest of the review.

Deepcoin is expanding beyond crypto

Deepcoin's product direction is also changing.

In September 2026, the company announced stock perpetuals as part of a broader multi-asset expansion.

The announcement explicitly describes them as perpetual derivative products and notes that availability depends on jurisdiction.

These products should not be confused with owning ordinary shares.

A stock perpetual gives price exposure under the contract's rules.

It does not automatically give the trader:

• shareholder voting rights;
• direct registration as an equity owner;
• ordinary brokerage custody;
• the same dividend rights as a shareholder.

That distinction becomes more important as crypto exchanges increasingly use familiar stock tickers inside derivatives interfaces.

A derivatives exchange should be tested like a risk system

For a spot investor, a basic exchange test might be:

Deposit → Buy → Withdraw

For a Deepcoin derivatives user, a more useful test is:

• deposit a limited amount;
• verify the correct account allocation;
• open a small isolated-margin perpetual position;
• inspect mark price and liquidation price;
• observe funding;
• close the position;
• review the actual trading fees charged;
• verify the resulting available balance;
• withdraw a small amount.

This tests much more of the actual product.

It also makes the difference between account equity and withdrawable funds visible before substantial leverage is used.

What matters most before using Deepcoin

Deepcoin's strongest features are aimed at sophisticated trading rather than passive custody.

Its 2026 API is extensive, its position-management tools are flexible and the platform supports both cross and isolated derivatives structures.

Those features are useful when the trader understands exactly what they are controlling.

The main due-diligence issues are equally specific.

Check the live fee rather than relying on one published example.

Deepcoin now exposes account-specific fee data through its API.

Separate unified account visibility from collateral sharing.

The API can aggregate many account types, but cross-margin exposure depends on the actual margin mode and product.

Model funding before holding perpetuals for long periods.

Execution fees can be smaller than repeated funding payments.

Treat copy trading as leveraged trading.

A leader's historical return does not reproduce their full portfolio or the follower's execution.

Take the Seychelles warning seriously.

The FSA explicitly stated in July 2026 that the named Deepcoin-linked entity was not authorized under the Seychelles VASP Act.

Read reserve claims narrowly.

CMC wallet-reserve data shows attributable assets; it is not the same as a full customer-liability proof.

Confirm geographic eligibility.

Deepcoin itself states that U.S. users and other restricted jurisdictions cannot access its services.

Test withdrawal controls early.

Supported chains, whitelist addresses and withdrawable balances should be verified before significant capital is committed.

Deepcoin can make sense for a trader who specifically values its derivatives architecture, API and position-management tools.

That is a much narrower case than saying it is simply a good place to hold crypto.

Its most advanced features increase flexibility.

They also increase the number of things the user needs to understand correctly.

Frequently asked questions

What are Deepcoin futures fees？

Deepcoin's official fee API documentation includes an Lv1 USDT perpetual example of 0.02% maker and 0.05% taker.

That should be treated as an example rather than a universal Deepcoin rate. The platform now exposes account- and instrument-specific fee queries, so users should confirm the live rate applicable to their own account.

What are Deepcoin spot fees？

Spot is queried separately from derivatives in Deepcoin's fee API.

Current fee trackers that reference Deepcoin's published schedule generally show a standard rate around 0.10% maker and 0.10% taker, but users should confirm the rate shown by Deepcoin for the actual account and pair because promotions or account conditions can differ.

What is Deepcoin's unified account？

Deepcoin's 2026 API can return balances across Funding, Spot, USDT Swap, Coin-margined Swap, Bonus, Rebate, Event Contract, Copy Trading and Robot accounts in one response.

This improves account-level visibility.

It does not mean that every balance across every account type automatically serves as collateral for every futures position.

Does Deepcoin support isolated margin？

Yes.

Deepcoin's trading API supports both cross and isolated margin modes for applicable derivatives positions.

Isolated margin can help limit how much assigned collateral a particular position can consume, although the isolated allocation itself can still be lost.

What is the risk of cross margin on Deepcoin？

Cross margin allows eligible collateral within the applicable margin structure to support positions.

This can improve capital efficiency but can expose a wider pool of collateral when positions move against the trader.

Users should check which funds are actually included in the relevant margin calculation rather than relying on total account equity.

Is Deepcoin regulated in Seychelles？

The Seychelles Financial Services Authority issued a warning on July 5, 2026 stating that the Deepcoin-linked entity it identified as DC Group Ltd., formerly DEEPCOIN Global Limited, did not have authorization under the Virtual Asset Service Providers Act 2024.

The FSA also said it had not received an application from the entity at the time of the notice.

Does the Seychelles warning mean Deepcoin is a scam？

The Seychelles FSA warning concerns unauthorized VASP activity.

It does not state that Deepcoin stole customer assets or establish that every transaction on the platform is fraudulent. Users should nevertheless treat the warning as material regulatory information when evaluating the exchange.

Is Deepcoin available in the United States？

Deepcoin currently states that it does not provide products or services to users in the United States and other restricted jurisdictions.

Older references to U.S. money-services registrations should therefore not be interpreted as proof that U.S. residents can currently use Deepcoin's trading products.

Does Deepcoin have proof of reserves？

Deepcoin currently promotes CoinMarketCap reserve proof, and CoinMarketCap displays blockchain reserve assets attributed to the exchange.

This is useful evidence of disclosed assets but is not the same as a customer-verifiable Merkle-tree liability proof showing that all included customer balances are fully represented.

Does Deepcoin use third-party custody？

Deepcoin states that it uses Cobo custody as part of its asset-security architecture.

Third-party custody can strengthen key-management controls, but it does not eliminate exchange, legal, account or derivatives risk.

Has Deepcoin been hacked？

Deepcoin currently states that it has experienced zero crypto theft since establishment.

There is no widely documented major Deepcoin central-wallet theft comparable with several historical exchange breaches, but that does not guarantee future security.

Is Deepcoin suitable for beginners？

Its spot markets can be used without leverage, but many of Deepcoin's distinguishing products are aimed at active derivatives traders.

Users of perpetuals need to understand leverage, notional exposure, cross versus isolated margin, mark price, funding and liquidation before opening positions.

Does Deepcoin copy trading reduce derivatives risk？

No.

Copy trading automates the replication of another trader's positions. Followers can still face leverage, funding, liquidation, slippage and market losses, and their execution can differ from the leader's.