Aave founder says V3 unaffected after third-party adapter exploit drains $305K

Extrait:Aave founder Stani Kulechov said Aave v3 was unaffected after a third-party adapter exploit drained about $305,000 from two Safe multisigs.

Aave founder Stani Kulechov said Aave v3 was unaffected by an exploit that drained roughly $305,000 from two Safe multisig wallets through a third-party adapter built on top of the lending protocol.

“This is not Aave v3 contract, its third party external adapter built on top of Aave, zero effect on Aave v3,” Kulechov said on X.

Blockchain security firm SlowMist said the attack targeted a module used to open and close leveraged Aave v3 positions through Safe wallets. The attacker exploited an access-control flaw that allowed a fake Safe contract to pass the adapters authorization check.

SlowMist said the adapter also allowed the caller to control the router and transaction data used for swaps. The attacker used that functionality to execute transactions through the victim Safes and drain weETH and collateral.

Around 1,300 wrapped Ether (WETH) in debt was repaid during the attack to unlock collateral, according to SlowMist. The attacker ultimately stole about 114.09 Ether (ETH), worth roughly $305,000, from two Safe multisigs.

The security firm identified the vulnerable FlashLoopAdapter contract and the attackers wallet but did not report any losses to Aave v3 itself.

Related: Aave launches V4 on Avalanche, laying groundwork for tokenized credit markets

Avertissement

Les opinions exprimées dans cet article représentent le point de vue personnel de l'auteur et ne constituent pas des conseils d'investissement de la plateforme. La plateforme ne garantit pas l'exactitude, l'exhaustivité ou l'actualité des informations contenues dans cet article et n'est pas responsable de toute perte résultant de l'utilisation ou de la confiance dans les informations contenues dans cet article.
Article précédent

Le taux d'épargne américain atteint son plus bas de 2022 : Bitcoin peut-il servir de couverture ?

Article suivant

Le stablecoin USDT revient vers Bitcoin après dix ans : les utilisateurs doivent-ils sen préoccuper ?