Ripple Executives Refuse to Provide Their Offshore Trading Records

摘要:Tenreiro stresses that the defendants are refusing to turn over these records despite placing “significant weight” on the fact that they were trading outside the U.S. in their motions to dismiss.

Jorge Tenreiro, a senior trial attorney at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, claims that neither Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse nor co-founder Chris Larsen has provided any documents related to their accounts on foreign exchanges in a letter to Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn.

Tenreiro stresses that the defendants are refusing to turn over these records despite placing “significant weight” on the fact that they were trading outside the U.S. in their motions to dismiss.

Based on its forensic analysis, the SEC alleges that Larsen and Garlinghouse have transferred hundreds of millions of XRP tokens to at least a dozen foreign trading platforms apart from U.S.-domiciled ones.

Going after foreign exchanges and Ripples partners

As reported by U.Today, the SEC has sent a slew of Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) requests to foreign regulators.

The SEC is trying to obtain documents from 14 cryptocurrency exchanges, five companies that use Ripples On-Demand Liquidity (ODL) solution, and an investor who bought XRP directly from the distributed ledger company.

Countering Ripples arguments, the agency claims that the federal securities laws do not restrict its ability to send requests to foreign regulators:

Nor do the federal securities laws restrict the SECs ability to send Requests to foreign regulators once the SEC files a civil action against any particular party. The statute does not distinguish between Requests sent during a civil enforcement action for purposes of obtaining evidence in a continuing investigation and those transmitted for purposes of the litigation.

Three foreign regulators have prohibited disclosing their communications with the SEC while two of them have refused to provide any assistance.

The regulator states that Ripples request to turn over these privileged communications is “improper.”

免責聲明

本文觀點僅代表作者個人觀點,不構成本平台的投資建議,本平台不對文章信息準確性、完整性和及時性作出任何保證,亦不對因使用或信賴文章信息引發的任何損失承擔責任
上一篇

【天眼合约日报】BTC延续震荡 调整或需更长时间

下一篇

CBDC|不丹合作「瑞波CBDC解決方案」試驗央行數位貨幣 | 動區動趨-最具影響力的區塊鏈媒體 (比特幣, 加密貨幣)