A part of FTX survived, and its the case for the CLARITY Act

摘要:Current federal crypto protections rest on revocable guidance, pilots, and letters rather than law, leaving investors unevenly protected by states and unguarded nationally. FTXs collapse proved the gap: its unregulated offshore exchange abused customer assets for years, while CFTC-regulated LedgerX survived intact because segregation was legally required and enforced. FTX operated offshore because Washington offered enforcement without clear rules, driving capital abroad; recent regulatory clarity has begun pulling firms back. The CLARITY Act would make the regulated, onshore model permanent, ensuring exchanges choose transparency over darkness, as Bullish, already regulated globally, now seeks CFTC registration.

So the protections stay what they are: at the federal level not law, but an interpretive notice sorting 16 tokens, a collateral pilot, a few no-action letters, a memorandum of understanding between two federal agencies, any of it revocable without a vote. The rest is left to the states, where investors get real protection in certain states, less elsewhere, and in some states none at all, none of it reaching a market that is national. The last great collapse already showed which protections hold and which give way.

When FTX failed, its offshore exchange misused its customers‘ assets for years. But several entities under the FTX umbrella — including LedgerX, a CFTC-regulated exchange and clearinghouse — came through the collapse whole, their customers’ assets segregated and intact. LedgerX survived for one reason: its protections were law. Not a clever mechanism but a plain one, customer segregation a regulator required and checked, which held whether or not anyone chose to honor it once the panic set in. The unregulated part of FTX ran on promises. In one collapse, under one roof, law held and promises broke.

FTX sat offshore for a reason. For years the United States met this industry with enforcement in place of rules, and its capital and talent went where the rules were clear, to Europe, Asia, and the Gulf. The rest went where there was no real oversight, and that is the gap an exchange like FTX grows in. When Washington started to offer clarity, the firms started returning to the U.S: Nexo came back after years away, London's Wintermute opened a New York office, and Switzerland's Taurus set up in New York to serve its bank clients. Law protects what it can reach, and the CLARITY Act would make that migration permanent instead of leaving the next firm to choose the dark. It would make the regulated, onshore model the norm for firms such as Bullish, a NYSE-listed digital asset market infrastructure firm (and the parent company of CoinDesk) already regulated in financial centres including Frankfurt, Hong Kong and New York, now pursuing CFTC registration as a designated contract market and derivatives clearing organization.

免责声明

本文观点仅代表作者个人观点,不构成本平台的投资建议,本平台不对文章信息准确性、完整性和及时性作出任何保证,亦不对因使用或信赖文章信息引发的任何损失承担责任
上一篇

美国7月意外减少23,000个岗位,引发对美联储加息前景的质疑

下一篇

最新动态:“这种情况不可能永远持续下去”:在风险市场反弹之际,审视比特币疲软的价格表现