The CLARITY Act Failed — So Who Regulates Crypto Now?

요약:The CLARITY Act was supposed to answer one of cryptos biggest questions: which regulator controls which part of the market?Instead, the bill stalled in

The CLARITY Act was supposed to answer one of cryptos biggest questions: which regulator controls which part of the market?

Instead, the bill stalled in the Senate on Sept. 15 after failing to clear the 60-vote threshold needed to advance. The result leaves the U.S. without the broad market-structure framework the legislation was designed to create.

That does not mean crypto is suddenly unregulated.

The SEC and CFTC were already coordinating on digital assets before the vote. In March, the two agencies signed an official SEC-CFTC memorandum of understanding aimed at clarifying product definitions, modernizing trading rules and developing a more coordinated crypto framework.

U.S. crypto oversight remains split across multiple regulators.SEC vs. CFTC Is Still the Main Divide

The SEC remains responsible for applying federal securities laws when a crypto asset, token offering or transaction falls within securities law.

Earlier this year, the SEC issued new guidance covering areas including staking, mining, airdrops and when a non-security crypto asset can become part of an investment contract. The CFTC joined that interpretation and said it would administer the Commodity Exchange Act consistently with it.

The CFTC, meanwhile, already oversees crypto futures, options and other derivatives.

Its authority over the spot marketis narrower. For non-security commodities such as Bitcoin, the agency can pursue fraud and manipulation, but Congress has not given it the same comprehensive registration regime for spot crypto exchanges that it has for derivatives markets.

That jurisdictional gap is exactly what the CLARITY Act was intended to address.

Coinpaper previously broke down the existing SEC-versus-CFTC divide, while the failed Senate vote sent Bitcoin below $75,000.

Regulators Arent Waiting for Congress

The bigger development now is that federal agencies are moving ahead anyway.

Discover more

Finance

Digital Currencies

Brokerages & Day Trading

The CFTC has sent a new crypto-market rulemaking proposal into White House regulatory review, signaling that it intends to use existing authority even without the CLARITY Act. The exact scope will matter because regulators cannot simply create powers that Congress never granted them.

Stablecoins are somewhat different because Congress already passed the GENIUS Act, creating a separate federal framework for payment stablecoins. Other crypto businesses can also face FinCEN anti-money-laundering obligations, banking supervision and state licensing requirements.

면책 성명

본 기사의 견해는 저자의 개인적 견해일 뿐이며 본 플랫폼은 투자 권고를 하지 않습니다. 본 플랫폼은 기사 내 정보의 정확성, 완전성, 적시성을 보장하지 않으며, 개인의 기사 내 정보에 의한 손실에 대해 책임을 지지 않습니다.
전편

VanEck, 보상 삭감에도 경영진 지분 희석 문제로 Metaplanet 비판

다음

Kalshi, 미국 주식 무기한 선물 신청으로 Coinbase에 합류