Big XRP Imbalance: Why 72% ETF Inflow Spike Fails to Lift Price

요약:XRP drops despite a 72% ETF surge to $23.87 million, exposing a spot market imbalance that overrides institutional buying.

The current decline in XRP has clearly exposed the most common misconception lately — exchange-traded funds (ETFs) do not control the token's price; they merely confirm its status. The real price moves are still generated in the spot market.

While inflow data continues to set records — in just 24 hours, from Aug. 24 to Aug. 25, daily net inflows into spot XRP ETFs jumped 72%, rising from $13.88 million to $23.87 million, while the funds' total assets under management reached an all-time high of $1.46 billion — the actual price on exchanges is moving in the opposite direction.

US spot XRP ETF inflows and net assets vs spot price. Source: SoSoValue

On Wednesday, XRP corrected to $1.3783, losing about 4% over the past 24 hours.

This paradox proves a simple truth: ETFs do not move the price of XRP. They can stabilize it, smooth out volatility, or reflect institutional interest, but they do not act as a growth driver.

If not ETFs, who is actually moving the price of XRP?

The real trend is now being dictated by on-chain activity, which is attempting to digest the end of a massive 20-month depression. Unlike passive, methodical ETF inflows, the real fuel behind XRP's recent rally of more than 40% came from the actions of large strategic players.

Immediately before last week's surge, millionaire wallets — addresses holding between 1 million and 10 million XRP — went on an aggressive buying spree, accumulating nearly 500 million tokens.

It was this large-scale accumulation by whales that pushed XRP out of a brutal downtrend that had lasted 608 days, during which the token lost 54.47% of its value, sliding from highs near $3.01 to a cycle low of $0.9939.

Once this two-year accumulation ceiling was broken, the price delivered a strong move to $1.5219, immediately pushing the daily RSI into deeply overbought territory.

The subsequent pullback became inevitable because of market psychology: retail investors who had been trapped in losses for all 608 days began taking profits and moving into cash at the first strong rebound.

The concentration of retail selling in the spot market now outweighs ETF volumes many times over, leaving the funds with only the role of a silent market stabilizer.

면책 성명

본 기사의 견해는 저자의 개인적 견해일 뿐이며 본 플랫폼은 투자 권고를 하지 않습니다. 본 플랫폼은 기사 내 정보의 정확성, 완전성, 적시성을 보장하지 않으며, 개인의 기사 내 정보에 의한 손실에 대해 책임을 지지 않습니다.
전편

찰스 호스킨슨 ‘카르다노 승리…이더리움 필요’

다음

리볼루트 유로 스테이블코인 3가지