FlightAware drops Kalshi lawsuit over a market niche that data shows it never took off

요약:Kalshi paused its flight cancellation prediction contracts after social media users warned that malicious actors could trigger cancellations to collect payouts, and trading data showed very low participation in the niche aviation market. In contrast to Kalshis $148 billion in overall volume this year, the open U.S. flight cancellation contract had only 31,412 contracts traded and about $1,842 in aggregate dollar volume. The pause followed a lawsuit by FlightAware, which accused Kalshi of using its flight data and trademark without permission. Kalshi denied the claims, citing nominative fair use and suggesting U.S. Department of Transportation data as an alternative settlement source. Neither company responded immediately to requests for comment, and the filing did not disclose whether an agreement was reached.

According to a Fortune article in July, Kalshi decided to pause flight cancellation contracts, after social media users expressed concerns over malicious actors causing flight cancellations to collect payouts. And according to Kalshi data, retail participation in the niche aviation series has been modest. For the U.S. flight cancellation bet currently open until Aug. 14, the data reveals only 31,412 total contracts traded, representing $1,842.48 in aggregate dollar volume and only 1,120 contracts held in open interest. The low liquidity here stands in stark contrast with Kalshis $148 billion in volume this year alone, that same data shows.

The filing does not state whether the companies reached an agreement or whether Kalshi changed its markets or their settlement source.

Kalshi and FlightAware were contacted via email for comment but neither responded immediately.

FlightAware had accused Kalshi of using its flight data and a trademark without permission to run bets on airline cancellations. The flight tracking firm was seeking damages and an injunction over contracts that allowed users to trade on the percentage of flights canceled nationally or at specific airports.

Kalshi had denied violating FlightAware‘s license or infringing its trademark, according to the original complaint. It said its references to FlightAware constituted nominative fair use. The platform had also identified U.S. Department of Transportation flight data as an alternative source for settling the contracts, according to FlightAware’s complaint.

면책 성명

본 기사의 견해는 저자의 개인적 견해일 뿐이며 본 플랫폼은 투자 권고를 하지 않습니다. 본 플랫폼은 기사 내 정보의 정확성, 완전성, 적시성을 보장하지 않으며, 개인의 기사 내 정보에 의한 손실에 대해 책임을 지지 않습니다.
전편

그레이스케일, AI 도입 수요…4개 네트워크 주목

다음

블룸버그 보도에 따르면 Wintermute, 암호화폐를 넘어선 10억 달러 규모 AI 사업 추진 계획