Lummis Says CLARITY Act Is Dead. The Democrats Who Killed It Say Otherwise

요약:Seven Democrats who voted against the CLARITY Act have said they remain committed to passing it, as Sen. Lummis called it dead.

Seven Senate Democrats voted Nay on the Senate‘s September 15 cloture vote on the Digital Asset Market Clarity (CLARITY) Act, according to the chamber’s official roll call. Preceding this, CLARITY Act champion Senator Lummis said if it failed its first vote, they were ‘done.’

A day later, the same seven declared themselves committed to passing the bill.

Sponsored

Sponsored

The Record Is Clear

Senate Roll Call Vote 234, taken at 2:19 p.m. ET on September 15, lists each of the seven by name against the bills cloture motion, the procedural step that needed 60 votes to advance debate and fell to 49.

Senator Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.), the bill‘s lead sponsor, had already warned that failure would end the fight, telling reporters, “I think we’re done. Its over.”

Sen. Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.) tells a large gaggle of reporters that if the Clarity cloture vote fails today, “I think we're done. It's over. Because we've been working on this bill for over a year, and we've given them over 120 of their requests. That's enough.”

The next day, the same seven senators issued a joint statement striking a different tone.

“We remain committed to working in a bipartisan fashion to get this legislation passed.”

Sponsored

Sponsored

Seven Democratic senators release a statement saying they “remain committed” to enacting the Clarity Act – Gillibrand, Alsobrooks, Booker, Cortez Masto, Warner, Warnock

Not a New Position, a Repeated One

That statement is not a first-time reversal. Six of the seven, plus Senator John Hickenlooper (D-Colo.) in Gillibrands place, issued nearly identical language in July, calling an earlier Republican draft insufficient on ethics and consumer protection while pledging to keep working toward a deal.

The pattern holds: oppose the specific text on the floor, while publicly keeping the door open to a future version.

Republicans reject that framing. House Majority Whip Tom Emmer accused the bloc of saying one thing publicly and voting another way, pointing to Gillibrands appearance at a Digital Chamber panel in March, where she said she wanted the US to lead the industry.

What This Means for CLARITY Act

Whether the CLARITY Act is dead or merely paused now depends on whose framing holds. Republicans control the floor calendar and have not scheduled another vote.

The seven Democrats have offered no new text and no timeline, only a repeat of language they have used before, leaving the bill‘s fate exactly where Tuesday’s vote left it.

면책 성명

본 기사의 견해는 저자의 개인적 견해일 뿐이며 본 플랫폼은 투자 권고를 하지 않습니다. 본 플랫폼은 기사 내 정보의 정확성, 완전성, 적시성을 보장하지 않으며, 개인의 기사 내 정보에 의한 손실에 대해 책임을 지지 않습니다.
전편

Circle, USDC를 네이티브 가스 토큰으로 사용하는 Arc 메인넷 출시

다음

S&P 글로벌, 블록체인 보안 플랫폼 오픈제플린 인수