CFTC considers Bitcoin, Ethereum, Tether to be commodities

요약:According to the CFTC, these digital assets are commodities because they satisfy the definition of the term as defined by the United States Constitution.

In its Dec. 13 court filing against FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried, the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) stated that digital assets such as Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), and Tether (USDT) are commodities.

According to the CFTC, these digital assets are commodities because they satisfy the definition of the term as defined by the United States Constitution.

Is the CFTC Chairman of a different mind?

While the CFTC lawsuit stated that ETH was a commodity, CFTC chairman Rostin Behnam appears to view the asset differently.

Benham stated at a recent private cryptocurrency event at Princeton University that BTC is the only cryptocurrency that should be classified as a commodity.

The statement contradicted the regulatory chief's previous ones. In a CNBC interview in May, Benham stated that Bitcoin and Ethereum were suitable for classification as commodities.

He reportedly said something similar at a New York event in October, implying that SEC chair Gary Gensler has a different opinion.

Following the migration of ETH to the proof-of-stake network, Gensler reportedly stated that cryptocurrencies that allow staking could qualify as securities under the Howey test.

Meanwhile, token classification remains a major issue in the United States, with regulators failing to clarify how assets can be classified. The SEC and crypto payment firm Ripple are currently engaged in a two-year legal battle over whether XRP sales qualify as securities.

Other countries, such as Belgium, have declared that assets without issuers, such as Bitcoin and Ethereum, are not securities, whereas Canada's Securities Administrators (CSA) recently stated that stablecoins may be securities or derivatives.

As a reminder, WikiBit is ready to help you search the qualifications and reputation of projects in a bid to protect you from hidden dangers in this risky industry!

면책 성명

본 기사의 견해는 저자의 개인적 견해일 뿐이며 본 플랫폼은 투자 권고를 하지 않습니다. 본 플랫폼은 기사 내 정보의 정확성, 완전성, 적시성을 보장하지 않으며, 개인의 기사 내 정보에 의한 손실에 대해 책임을 지지 않습니다.
전편

Bitcoin’s 2022 realized losses is almost double the size of realized profit

다음

Port3: A look back at 2022 and a peek ahead to 2023