Information text

Your Location:Home>News>Main body

99% gone in 60 seconds: How a Polkadot trader may have crashed DOT futures


Abstract:Polkadot (DOT) futures at Binance flash-crashed by 99.5%, potentially generating an $8.3 million profit for the 'trader’ if they used this clever strategy.

  Marcel Pechman

  Mar 05, 2021

99% gone in 60 seconds: How a Polkadot trader may have crashed DOT futures

  Polkadot (DOT) futures at Binance flash-crashed by 99.5%, potentially generating an $8.3-million profit for the ‘trader’ if they used this clever strategy.

  78145 Total views

  67 Total shares

  Listen to article


  Market Analysis

  On March 5, Polkadots DOT experienced a flash crash at Binance perpetual futures that resulted in the contract trading as low at $0.20. While this could have been an honest fat-finger trading mistake, a number of indicators point to a planned attack.

  While no hard evidence will likely ever emerge, the open interest increase just 24 hours ahead of the event indicates that an attacker could have generated an $8.3-million profit by manipulating Binances matching engine.

DOT perpetual futures on Mar. 4, USD pricing. Source: Binance

  As shown above, during the three-minute candle, $20.4 million worth of DOT contracts traded. Although the swift downside move was a 99.5% flash crash, it did not result in cascading liquidations.

  Futures contracts liquidations are calculated using the price of spot exchanges. Thus, a flash-crash exclusively on futures prices would not impact most traders. According to Binance:

“The Price Index is a bucket of prices from the major Spot Market Exchanges, weighted by their relative volume.”

  As per Binance‘s support website, Polkadot coin-margined futures index price is composed of Kraken (DOT/USD), Binance (DOT/USD), Binance (DOT/BTC), OKEx (DOT/BTC) and Huobi’s (DOT/BTC) market.

  It is worth noting that this specific contract is coin-margined instead of the more liquid Tether-settled one. Cointelegraph recently analyzed those differences, stating that the Tether-based contract “doesn‘t need an active hedge to protect collateral (margin) exposure, thus it’s a better choice for retail traders.”

Data uncovers the planned ‘attack’

  For an attacker to set up this trade, the first step would be building a leveraged long position while simultaneously creating short exposure using another account.

  To create a flash crash while risking the minimum amount possible, preferably, this event should take place not more than a couple of days ahead of the planned ‘attack.’

DOT/USD perpetual futures open interest. Source: Binance

  As depicted above, DOT/USD perpetual futures open interest grew from 1.92 million DOT to 3.34 million some 30 hours ahead of the flash crash, equivalent to a $47-million increase.

  To differentiate the attack from a regular leveraged-long, one should track the long-to-short ratio. To maximize gains from the flash crash, the attacker would have created a substantially higher short leveraged amount, thus impacting the long-to-short ratio.

DOT/USD perpetual futures long-to-short ratio. Source: Binance

  The data above shows that the average 4.25 ratio favoring longs was severely impacted during the open interest increase. This would confirm the theory of a coordinated attack.

How the trade is executed

  By holding a considerably larger net short position when both accounts are combined, the attacker would profit from a flash crash. All this entity needs to initiate the event is to market sell the net long position. This move would trigger a substantial sell order, crashing the futures contract. Meanwhile, the other account, previously net short, would score big.

  At a $26.73 average price, 762,000 DOT contracts traded during the three-minute flash-crash candle. Considering the change in the long-to-short ratio, the attack most likely created a $30-million long position. Meanwhile, the secondary account held a $10-million net short exposure.

  Although far from the 99.5% price crash, this 19% drop from $33 likely generated a $9.5-million gain for the account holding the $10-million short exposure if 5x leverage was in play. On the other hand, the collateral lost for the $30-million long position amounts to $1.2 million if 25x leverage was deployed.

  It is important to emphasize that holders of Binance DOT futures contracts were unlikely affected by the flash crash. Therefore, the attackers net long account should be holding a negative balance, which the Binance insurance fund will likely cover.

  The above calculations are mere speculations based on exchange-provided data. As previously mentioned, it is unlikely that hard evidence of this attack will ever surface.

  The views and opinions expressed here are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Cointelegraph. Every investment and trading move involves risk. You should conduct your own research when making a decision.

  • #Cryptocurrencies
  • #Altcoin
  • #Markets
  • #Cryptocurrency Exchange
  • #Futures
  • #Market Analysis
  • #Trading
  • #Polkadot

  Related News

  •   ETH Miners Will Have Little Choice Once Ethereum 2.0 Launches With PoS

  •   How crypto is going to shake up the world of mixed martial arts

  •   Bridging the Bitcoin gender gap: Crypto lets everyone access wealth

  •   Women, decentralization and the worlds economic drive: Experts answer

  •   Record $584M Litecoin futures open interest signals institutional inflow

  •   $580M open interest makes Cardano (ADA) the third largest futures market



  Editors Choice

  • Bitcoin price cracks major resistance as analyst eyes $70K 'destiny'
  • South African crypto firms warn opaque regulations are harming the industry
  • Southeast Asia's first Bitcoin fund launches to meet local institutional demand
  • Ethereum to roll out Berlin upgrade with 4 EIPs
  • Glassnode: $47k showed strongest on-chain support since BTC broke $11k

  Advertise with us

Token conversion
Exchange rate conversion
Calculation for foreign exchange purchasing

Current Rate0